December 2016 - aarch64-port-dev

RFR: 8169697: aarch64: vectorized MLA instruction not generated for some test cases
by Ningsheng Jian 04 May '17

04 May '17

Hi, NEON vector MLA instructions can not be generated in some simple multiply-add cases. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8169697 The following webrev contributed by Yang Zhang (yang.zhang(a)linaro.org) can resolve it. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~njian/8169697/webrev.00/ Please help to review it. To minimize impact, this patch only changes aarch64 specified code. Do you think this is OK for 9? If yes, do we need a FC Extension Request? In the mean time, Yang also has a more generic fix for this issue, which patches share code and could also fix this issue: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~njian/8169697/webrev.share/ Which do you think is better? Both patches tested with fastdebug jtreg. Thanks, Ningsheng

5 21

RFR: 8168503 JEP 297: Unified arm32/arm64 Port
by Bob Vandette 24 Mar '17

24 Mar '17

Please review the proposed changes to be integrated under JEP 297. Summary: This JEP adds arm32 and arm64 Linux platform support to OpenJDK for JDK 9. This changeset also removes the support for the pregenerated interpreter since this is no longer supported. The addition of arm64 does not replace the existing aarch64 port. A new configure option (-with-cpu-port=) allows for the selection of the existing aarch64 versus the 64-bit arm64 support being added via this JEP. Please refer to the JEP for more details. JEP 297: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168503 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bobv/8168503 Note: A complete build-able forest containing these changes is located here: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/aarch32-port/jdk9-arm3264 Thanks, Bob Vandette

7 22

RFR: AArch64: -XX:-UseOnStackReplacement does not work together with -XX:+TieredCompilation.
by Ningsheng Jian 21 Feb '17

21 Feb '17

Hi, Hotspot patch [1] introduces a test case hotspot/test/compiler/interpreter/DisableOSRTest.java which also exposes the same issue on aarch64. I.e. with -XX:-UseOnStackReplacement and -XX:+TieredCompilation options, there are still OSR compilations found from -XX:+PrintCompilation. On x86, the increment_mask_and_jump just jumps to the next instruction if backedge_counter_overflow is not generated. So there is no such issue - but is it intended? The following fix on AArch64 is to revert [2] to align with x86 code and assign the correct branch target based on the UseOnStackReplacement option. http://people.linaro.org/~ningsheng.jian/disable-osr/webrev.00/ Tested with jtreg. [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/fd222df9f27c [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/aarch64-port/jdk8/hotspot/rev/18e5cbbe8abf

2 3

Fwd: Compact strings enablement - JTreg runs
by Stuart Monteith 30 Jan '17

30 Jan '17

Hello, I sent this to the wrong address by accident, and it hadn't bounced - the autocorrect kicked in this time. With a view to enable compact strings by default, I've run JTreg against a build from yesterday with "-XX:-CompactStrings" and "-XX:+CompactStrings". I get the following differences: 0: JTwork-compactoff pass: 5,840; fail: 1,793; error: 21; not run: 331 1: JTwork-compacton pass: 5,836; fail: 1,793; error: 25; not run: 331 0 1 Test fail pass com/sun/jdi/InterruptHangTest.java pass error java/awt/Dialog/CloseDialog/CloseDialogTest.java fail pass java/awt/Graphics2D/DrawString/DrawStringCrash.java pass error java/lang/instrument/PremainClass/NoPremainAgentTest.java pass fail java/rmi/activation/Activatable/restartCrashedService/RestartCrashedService.java pass fail java/rmi/server/RMISocketFactory/useSocketFactory/unicast/UseCustomSocketFactory.java error pass java/util/ResourceBundle/modules/visibility/visibility.sh pass fail java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java pass error java/util/stream/boottest/java.base/java/util/stream/SpinedBufferTest.java fail pass java/util/zip/EntryCount64k.java pass error sun/security/provider/SecureRandom/StrongSecureRandom.java pass error tools/launcher/ArgFileSyntax.java 12 differences Ideally there would be 0 failures and errors in both, but I'll check to see what the differences were. Some of the names are suspicious, others - such as concurrency tests - look like they have the potential to have issues. AFAICT, this is the only changed needed to make compact strings the default: hotspot/src/cpu/aarch64/vm/globals_aarch64.hpp -- define_pd_global(bool, CompactStrings, false); ++ define_pd_global(bool, CompactStrings, true); hasNegatives - please find attached my most recent results with my hasNegatives intrinsic. The vertical axis is time (logarithmic) -lower is better. The horizontal axis is the number of characters scanned before has_negatives returns true. I'm trying to even-out the middle to lower side of the graph, as I expect has_negatives will trip either early, or late. Regards, Stuart

3 16

Request for review JDK-8140588 - Internal Error: gc/g1/ptrQueue.hpp:126 assert(_index == _sz) failed: invariant: queues are empty when activated
by Alexander Harlap 12 Jan '17

12 Jan '17

Please review change forJDK-8140588 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140588> - Internal Error: gc/g1/ptrQueue.hpp:126 assert(_index == _sz) failed: invariant: queues are empty when activated Change is located at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aharlap/8140588/webrev.00/ It implements Per Liden fix for rechecking value of marking in progress value inside C1 g1_pre_barrier code. Also here is optimization described by Thomas Schatzl - do recheck only if patching involved. Alex

5 10

RFR: Backport patch for 8165673 to aarch64/jdk8u
by Felix Yang 09 Jan '17

09 Jan '17

Hi, I see the same issue (8165673) for aarch64/jdk8u repo, and I am trying to backport this patch: # HG changeset patch # User adinn # Date 1474964726 -3600 # Tue Sep 27 09:25:26 2016 +0100 # Node ID f96dfffcb4148c3615826adda611e80fe1c264f9 # Parent 2765f61021270b8e5d2954eb81b33e8311332f62 8165673: AArch64: Fix JNI floating point argument handling Reviewed-by: aph, adinn Contributed-by: ningsheng.jian(a)linaro.org Here are the link to the original jdk9 patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/9cc82b204d20 The backport patch with some adaptations for the test case: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyang/8165673-backport/webrev.01/ Tested with Jtreg using an aarch64 server build. OK to backport? As I don't have write permission of the icedtea branch ( http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea7-forest/hotspot/) can someone do a backport for it please? Thanks for your help, Felix

4 6

JTREG, JCStress, SPECjbb2015 and Hadoop/Terasort results for OpenJDK 9 on AArch64
by ci_notify＠linaro.org 31 Dec '16

31 Dec '16

This is a summary of the JTREG test results =========================================== The build and test results are cycled every 15 days. For detailed information on the test output please refer to: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/openjdk-jtreg-nightly-tests/summary/2016/365… ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- client-release/hotspot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 1,307; fail: 6; error: 54 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 1,310; fail: 7; error: 58 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 1,309; fail: 6; error: 60 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 1,304; fail: 6; error: 65 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 1,305; fail: 6; error: 64 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 1,304; fail: 6; error: 65 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 1,286; fail: 25; error: 64 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 1,283; fail: 25; error: 67 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 1,275; fail: 25; error: 75 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 1,274; fail: 25; error: 76 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 1,273; fail: 25; error: 77 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 1,274; fail: 25; error: 76 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 1,273; fail: 25; error: 77 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 1,275; fail: 24; error: 78 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/30 pass: 1,272; fail: 25; error: 80 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- client-release/jdk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 7,223; fail: 639; error: 51 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 7,218; fail: 639; error: 58 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 7,224; fail: 642; error: 51 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 7,191; fail: 647; error: 54 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 7,206; fail: 647; error: 48 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 7,199; fail: 653; error: 49 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 7,196; fail: 653; error: 51 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 7,215; fail: 638; error: 51 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 7,229; fail: 624; error: 55 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 7,203; fail: 640; error: 66 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 7,213; fail: 635; error: 62 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 7,208; fail: 643; error: 60 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 7,215; fail: 630; error: 65 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 7,209; fail: 636; error: 65 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/30 pass: 7,234; fail: 619; error: 57 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- client-release/langtools ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 3,771; fail: 1; error: 19 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 3,776; fail: 1; error: 19 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 3,779; fail: 2; error: 20 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 3,771; fail: 1; error: 32 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 3,783; fail: 2; error: 23 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 3,787; fail: 1; error: 20 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 3,782; fail: 3; error: 23 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 3,784; fail: 2; error: 20 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 3,792; fail: 1; error: 20 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 3,781; fail: 1; error: 31 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 3,786; fail: 3; error: 24 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 3,781; fail: 3; error: 29 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 3,789; fail: 3; error: 21 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 3,782; fail: 2; error: 29 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/30 pass: 3,786; fail: 1; error: 26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- server-release/hotspot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 1,307; fail: 8; error: 55 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 1,313; fail: 8; error: 57 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 1,309; fail: 8; error: 61 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 1,308; fail: 8; error: 62 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 1,307; fail: 8; error: 63 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 1,306; fail: 8; error: 64 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 1,289; fail: 27; error: 62 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 1,285; fail: 27; error: 66 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 1,276; fail: 27; error: 75 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 1,277; fail: 27; error: 74 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 1,276; fail: 27; error: 75 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 1,273; fail: 28; error: 77 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 1,275; fail: 27; error: 76 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 1,274; fail: 27; error: 79 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/30 pass: 1,273; fail: 27; error: 80 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- server-release/jdk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 7,221; fail: 644; error: 48 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 7,232; fail: 635; error: 48 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 7,239; fail: 637; error: 41 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 7,207; fail: 642; error: 43 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 7,222; fail: 635; error: 44 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 7,230; fail: 626; error: 45 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 7,216; fail: 641; error: 43 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 7,231; fail: 629; error: 44 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 7,246; fail: 617; error: 45 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 7,223; fail: 638; error: 48 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 7,215; fail: 632; error: 63 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 7,203; fail: 656; error: 52 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 7,236; fail: 630; error: 44 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 7,221; fail: 646; error: 43 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/30 pass: 7,228; fail: 629; error: 53 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- server-release/langtools ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 3,765; fail: 1; error: 25 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 3,770; fail: 1; error: 25 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 3,777; fail: 1; error: 23 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 3,776; fail: 1; error: 27 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 3,785; fail: 1; error: 22 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 3,778; fail: 1; error: 29 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 3,781; fail: 2; error: 25 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 3,775; fail: 1; error: 30 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 3,785; fail: 1; error: 27 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 3,780; fail: 1; error: 32 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 3,783; fail: 1; error: 29 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 3,785; fail: 1; error: 27 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 3,783; fail: 2; error: 28 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 3,784; fail: 1; error: 28 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/30 pass: 3,783; fail: 1; error: 29 Previous results can be found here: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/openjdk-jtreg-nightly-tests/index.html SPECjbb2015 composite regression test completed =============================================== This test measures the relative performance of the server compiler running the SPECjbb2015 composite tests and compares the performance against the baseline performance of the server compiler taken on 2016-11-21. In accordance with [1], the SPECjbb2015 tests are run on a system which is not production ready and does not meet all the requirements for publishing compliant results. The numbers below shall be treated as non-compliant (nc) and are for experimental purposes only. Relative performance: Server max-jOPS (nc): 0.92x Relative performance: Server critical-jOPS (nc): 0.83x Details of the test setup and historical results may be found here: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/SPECjbb2015-results/ [1] http://www.spec.org/fairuse.html#Academic Regression test Hadoop-Terasort completed ========================================= This test measures the performance of the server and client compilers running Hadoop sorting a 1GB file using Terasort and compares the performance against the baseline performance of the Zero interpreter and against the baseline performance of the client and server compilers on 2014-04-01. Relative performance: Zero: 1.0, Client: 69.19, Server: 103.79 Client 69.19 / Client 2014-04-01 (43.00): 1.61x Server 103.79 / Server 2014-04-01 (71.00): 1.46x Details of the test setup and historical results may be found here: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/hadoop-terasort-benchmark-results/ This is a summary of the jcstress test results ============================================== The build and test results are cycled every 15 days. 2016-12-13 pass rate: 5981/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/347/results/ 2016-12-15 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/349/results/ 2016-12-16 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/350/results/ 2016-12-17 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/351/results/ 2016-12-18 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/352/results/ 2016-12-19 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/353/results/ 2016-12-20 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/354/results/ 2016-12-21 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/355/results/ 2016-12-23 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/357/results/ 2016-12-24 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/358/results/ 2016-12-25 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/359/results/ 2016-12-27 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/361/results/ 2016-12-28 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/362/results/ 2016-12-29 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/363/results/ 2016-12-31 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/365/results/ For detailed information on the test output please refer to: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/

1 0

RFR(s): 8171449" [aarch64] store_klass needs to use store release
by White, Derek 30 Dec '16

30 Dec '16

As the "FIXME" noted, aarch64 really does need to use a store release in the "store_klass" macro, at least when a concurrent GC is in effect. BUG: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171449 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drwhite/8171449/webrev.01/index.html BTW, PPC is likely to need a similar fix... Thanks, - Derek

6 30

JTREG, JCStress, SPECjbb2015 and Hadoop/Terasort results for OpenJDK 9 on AArch64
by ci_notify＠linaro.org 29 Dec '16

29 Dec '16

This is a summary of the JTREG test results =========================================== The build and test results are cycled every 15 days. For detailed information on the test output please refer to: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/openjdk-jtreg-nightly-tests/summary/2016/363… ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- client-release/hotspot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 1,306; fail: 6; error: 55 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 1,307; fail: 6; error: 54 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 1,310; fail: 7; error: 58 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 1,309; fail: 6; error: 60 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 1,304; fail: 6; error: 65 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 1,305; fail: 6; error: 64 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 1,304; fail: 6; error: 65 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 1,286; fail: 25; error: 64 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 1,283; fail: 25; error: 67 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 1,275; fail: 25; error: 75 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 1,274; fail: 25; error: 76 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 1,273; fail: 25; error: 77 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 1,274; fail: 25; error: 76 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 1,273; fail: 25; error: 77 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 1,275; fail: 24; error: 78 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- client-release/jdk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 7,198; fail: 657; error: 57 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 7,223; fail: 639; error: 51 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 7,218; fail: 639; error: 58 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 7,224; fail: 642; error: 51 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 7,191; fail: 647; error: 54 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 7,206; fail: 647; error: 48 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 7,199; fail: 653; error: 49 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 7,196; fail: 653; error: 51 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 7,215; fail: 638; error: 51 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 7,229; fail: 624; error: 55 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 7,203; fail: 640; error: 66 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 7,213; fail: 635; error: 62 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 7,208; fail: 643; error: 60 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 7,215; fail: 630; error: 65 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 7,209; fail: 636; error: 65 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- client-release/langtools ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 3,766; fail: 1; error: 24 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 3,771; fail: 1; error: 19 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 3,776; fail: 1; error: 19 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 3,779; fail: 2; error: 20 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 3,771; fail: 1; error: 32 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 3,783; fail: 2; error: 23 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 3,787; fail: 1; error: 20 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 3,782; fail: 3; error: 23 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 3,784; fail: 2; error: 20 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 3,792; fail: 1; error: 20 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 3,781; fail: 1; error: 31 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 3,786; fail: 3; error: 24 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 3,781; fail: 3; error: 29 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 3,789; fail: 3; error: 21 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 3,782; fail: 2; error: 29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- server-release/hotspot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 1,308; fail: 8; error: 54 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 1,307; fail: 8; error: 55 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 1,313; fail: 8; error: 57 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 1,309; fail: 8; error: 61 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 1,308; fail: 8; error: 62 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 1,307; fail: 8; error: 63 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 1,306; fail: 8; error: 64 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 1,289; fail: 27; error: 62 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 1,285; fail: 27; error: 66 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 1,276; fail: 27; error: 75 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 1,277; fail: 27; error: 74 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 1,276; fail: 27; error: 75 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 1,273; fail: 28; error: 77 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 1,275; fail: 27; error: 76 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 1,274; fail: 27; error: 79 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- server-release/jdk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 7,222; fail: 653; error: 37 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 7,221; fail: 644; error: 48 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 7,232; fail: 635; error: 48 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 7,239; fail: 637; error: 41 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 7,207; fail: 642; error: 43 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 7,222; fail: 635; error: 44 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 7,230; fail: 626; error: 45 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 7,216; fail: 641; error: 43 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 7,231; fail: 629; error: 44 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 7,246; fail: 617; error: 45 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 7,223; fail: 638; error: 48 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 7,215; fail: 632; error: 63 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 7,203; fail: 656; error: 52 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 7,236; fail: 630; error: 44 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 7,221; fail: 646; error: 43 1 fatal errors were detected; please follow the link above for more detail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- server-release/langtools ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 3,766; fail: 1; error: 24 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 3,765; fail: 1; error: 25 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 3,770; fail: 1; error: 25 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 3,777; fail: 1; error: 23 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 3,776; fail: 1; error: 27 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 3,785; fail: 1; error: 22 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 3,778; fail: 1; error: 29 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 3,781; fail: 2; error: 25 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 3,775; fail: 1; error: 30 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 3,785; fail: 1; error: 27 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 3,780; fail: 1; error: 32 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 3,783; fail: 1; error: 29 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 3,785; fail: 1; error: 27 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 3,783; fail: 2; error: 28 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/28 pass: 3,784; fail: 1; error: 28 Previous results can be found here: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/openjdk-jtreg-nightly-tests/index.html SPECjbb2015 composite regression test completed =============================================== This test measures the relative performance of the server compiler running the SPECjbb2015 composite tests and compares the performance against the baseline performance of the server compiler taken on 2016-11-21. In accordance with [1], the SPECjbb2015 tests are run on a system which is not production ready and does not meet all the requirements for publishing compliant results. The numbers below shall be treated as non-compliant (nc) and are for experimental purposes only. Relative performance: Server max-jOPS (nc): 0.92x Relative performance: Server critical-jOPS (nc): 0.80x Details of the test setup and historical results may be found here: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/SPECjbb2015-results/ [1] http://www.spec.org/fairuse.html#Academic Regression test Hadoop-Terasort completed ========================================= This test measures the performance of the server and client compilers running Hadoop sorting a 1GB file using Terasort and compares the performance against the baseline performance of the Zero interpreter and against the baseline performance of the client and server compilers on 2014-04-01. Relative performance: Zero: 1.0, Client: 72.02, Server: 105.34 Client 72.02 / Client 2014-04-01 (43.00): 1.67x Server 105.34 / Server 2014-04-01 (71.00): 1.48x Details of the test setup and historical results may be found here: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/hadoop-terasort-benchmark-results/ This is a summary of the jcstress test results ============================================== The build and test results are cycled every 15 days. 2016-12-12 pass rate: 5981/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/346/results/ 2016-12-13 pass rate: 5981/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/347/results/ 2016-12-15 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/349/results/ 2016-12-16 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/350/results/ 2016-12-17 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/351/results/ 2016-12-18 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/352/results/ 2016-12-19 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/353/results/ 2016-12-20 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/354/results/ 2016-12-21 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/355/results/ 2016-12-23 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/357/results/ 2016-12-24 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/358/results/ 2016-12-25 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/359/results/ 2016-12-27 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/361/results/ 2016-12-28 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/362/results/ 2016-12-29 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/363/results/ For detailed information on the test output please refer to: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/

1 0

JTREG, JCStress, SPECjbb2015 and Hadoop/Terasort results for OpenJDK 9 on AArch64
by ci_notify＠linaro.org 28 Dec '16

28 Dec '16

This is a summary of the JTREG test results =========================================== The build and test results are cycled every 15 days. For detailed information on the test output please refer to: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/openjdk-jtreg-nightly-tests/summary/2016/362… ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- client-release/hotspot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/10 pass: 1,307; fail: 6; error: 54 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 1,306; fail: 6; error: 55 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 1,307; fail: 6; error: 54 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 1,310; fail: 7; error: 58 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 1,309; fail: 6; error: 60 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 1,304; fail: 6; error: 65 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 1,305; fail: 6; error: 64 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 1,304; fail: 6; error: 65 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 1,286; fail: 25; error: 64 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 1,283; fail: 25; error: 67 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 1,275; fail: 25; error: 75 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 1,274; fail: 25; error: 76 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 1,273; fail: 25; error: 77 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 1,274; fail: 25; error: 76 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 1,273; fail: 25; error: 77 1 fatal errors were detected; please follow the link above for more detail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- client-release/jdk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/10 pass: 7,223; fail: 643; error: 45 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 7,198; fail: 657; error: 57 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 7,223; fail: 639; error: 51 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 7,218; fail: 639; error: 58 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 7,224; fail: 642; error: 51 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 7,191; fail: 647; error: 54 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 7,206; fail: 647; error: 48 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 7,199; fail: 653; error: 49 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 7,196; fail: 653; error: 51 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 7,215; fail: 638; error: 51 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 7,229; fail: 624; error: 55 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 7,203; fail: 640; error: 66 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 7,213; fail: 635; error: 62 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 7,208; fail: 643; error: 60 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 7,215; fail: 630; error: 65 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- client-release/langtools ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/10 pass: 3,770; fail: 1; error: 20 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 3,766; fail: 1; error: 24 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 3,771; fail: 1; error: 19 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 3,776; fail: 1; error: 19 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 3,779; fail: 2; error: 20 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 3,771; fail: 1; error: 32 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 3,783; fail: 2; error: 23 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 3,787; fail: 1; error: 20 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 3,782; fail: 3; error: 23 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 3,784; fail: 2; error: 20 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 3,792; fail: 1; error: 20 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 3,781; fail: 1; error: 31 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 3,786; fail: 3; error: 24 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 3,781; fail: 3; error: 29 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 3,789; fail: 3; error: 21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- server-release/hotspot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/10 pass: 1,309; fail: 8; error: 53 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 1,308; fail: 8; error: 54 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 1,307; fail: 8; error: 55 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 1,313; fail: 8; error: 57 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 1,309; fail: 8; error: 61 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 1,308; fail: 8; error: 62 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 1,307; fail: 8; error: 63 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 1,306; fail: 8; error: 64 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 1,289; fail: 27; error: 62 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 1,285; fail: 27; error: 66 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 1,276; fail: 27; error: 75 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 1,277; fail: 27; error: 74 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 1,276; fail: 27; error: 75 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 1,273; fail: 28; error: 77 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 1,275; fail: 27; error: 76 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- server-release/jdk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/10 pass: 7,230; fail: 639; error: 42 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 7,222; fail: 653; error: 37 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 7,221; fail: 644; error: 48 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 7,232; fail: 635; error: 48 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 7,239; fail: 637; error: 41 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 7,207; fail: 642; error: 43 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 7,222; fail: 635; error: 44 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 7,230; fail: 626; error: 45 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 7,216; fail: 641; error: 43 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 7,231; fail: 629; error: 44 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 7,246; fail: 617; error: 45 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 7,223; fail: 638; error: 48 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 7,215; fail: 632; error: 63 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 7,203; fail: 656; error: 52 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 7,236; fail: 630; error: 44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- server-release/langtools ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Build 0: aarch64/2016/dec/10 pass: 3,762; fail: 1; error: 28 Build 1: aarch64/2016/dec/11 pass: 3,766; fail: 1; error: 24 Build 2: aarch64/2016/dec/12 pass: 3,765; fail: 1; error: 25 Build 3: aarch64/2016/dec/14 pass: 3,770; fail: 1; error: 25 Build 4: aarch64/2016/dec/15 pass: 3,777; fail: 1; error: 23 Build 5: aarch64/2016/dec/16 pass: 3,776; fail: 1; error: 27 Build 6: aarch64/2016/dec/17 pass: 3,785; fail: 1; error: 22 Build 7: aarch64/2016/dec/18 pass: 3,778; fail: 1; error: 29 Build 8: aarch64/2016/dec/19 pass: 3,781; fail: 2; error: 25 Build 9: aarch64/2016/dec/20 pass: 3,775; fail: 1; error: 30 Build 10: aarch64/2016/dec/22 pass: 3,785; fail: 1; error: 27 Build 11: aarch64/2016/dec/23 pass: 3,780; fail: 1; error: 32 Build 12: aarch64/2016/dec/24 pass: 3,783; fail: 1; error: 29 Build 13: aarch64/2016/dec/26 pass: 3,785; fail: 1; error: 27 Build 14: aarch64/2016/dec/27 pass: 3,783; fail: 2; error: 28 Previous results can be found here: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/openjdk-jtreg-nightly-tests/index.html SPECjbb2015 composite regression test completed =============================================== This test measures the relative performance of the server compiler running the SPECjbb2015 composite tests and compares the performance against the baseline performance of the server compiler taken on 2016-11-21. In accordance with [1], the SPECjbb2015 tests are run on a system which is not production ready and does not meet all the requirements for publishing compliant results. The numbers below shall be treated as non-compliant (nc) and are for experimental purposes only. Relative performance: Server max-jOPS (nc): 0.91x Relative performance: Server critical-jOPS (nc): 0.78x Details of the test setup and historical results may be found here: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/SPECjbb2015-results/ [1] http://www.spec.org/fairuse.html#Academic Regression test Hadoop-Terasort completed ========================================= This test measures the performance of the server and client compilers running Hadoop sorting a 1GB file using Terasort and compares the performance against the baseline performance of the Zero interpreter and against the baseline performance of the client and server compilers on 2014-04-01. Relative performance: Zero: 1.0, Client: 70.93, Server: 104.56 Client 70.93 / Client 2014-04-01 (43.00): 1.65x Server 104.56 / Server 2014-04-01 (71.00): 1.47x Details of the test setup and historical results may be found here: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/hadoop-terasort-benchmark-results/ This is a summary of the jcstress test results ============================================== The build and test results are cycled every 15 days. 2016-12-11 pass rate: 6008/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/345/results/ 2016-12-12 pass rate: 5981/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/346/results/ 2016-12-13 pass rate: 5981/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/347/results/ 2016-12-15 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/349/results/ 2016-12-16 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/350/results/ 2016-12-17 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/351/results/ 2016-12-18 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/352/results/ 2016-12-19 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/353/results/ 2016-12-20 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/354/results/ 2016-12-21 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/355/results/ 2016-12-23 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/357/results/ 2016-12-24 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/358/results/ 2016-12-25 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/359/results/ 2016-12-27 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/361/results/ 2016-12-28 pass rate: 6050/6050, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/2016/362/results/ For detailed information on the test output please refer to: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdk9/jcstress-nightly-runs/

1 0