12 Sep
2021
12 Sep
'21
6:20 a.m.
On 11/09/2021 5:24 am, kabutz wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:08:05 GMT, Claes Redestad <redestad@openjdk.org> wrote:
This looks good. @cl4es might want to confirm that change was not intentional.
Completely unintentional, and perplexing since it's not a simple copy-paste error..
The thread priorities in Java are the wrong way round, (high is 10, low is 1) so I was not surprised by this mistake.
They are not "the wrong way around" they followed Solaris Global Dispatch Priorities (and Windows priorities for that matter). It makes a lot more sense than systems where a "higher priority" means a lower numerical priority value IMO. :) Cheers, David
-------------