29 Nov
2011
29 Nov
'11
4:19 p.m.
On 28/11/2011 08:36, Jing Lv wrote:
Hello Alan,
I am fine with the fix on the webrev, suppose it would be applied later? I don't remember (as it's been a long time) exactly I found the issue, maybe some code scan or some strong compiler :) (Problem with my mail server so I can only see your mail on website archive) Okay, I think we should go with the changes that I have in the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/7030624/webrev/ Could I get a reviewer for this? As a reminder, the issue that Jing has brought up a few times is that this code is using size_t which is unsigned. The changes in the webrev change the return type to jint. -Alan.