3 Oct
2018
3 Oct
'18
2:24 p.m.
On 03/10/2018 10:14, Andrew Dinn wrote:
: Sure, I'd be happy to change this.
Would READ_ONLY_SYNC and READ_WRITE_SYNC be suitable alternatives? Or do you have something else in mind?
I think that works but it means looking at the proposed MappedByteBuffer::isPersistent too. MappedByteBuffer hasn't needed methods to test if the mapping is read-only, read-write or private mapping and I wonder if isPersistent is really needed. -Alan