RFR (XS) 8155215: java.lang.String concatenation spec is unnecessarily strong
Hi, Please review this tiny spec improvement that syncs up JLS and java.lang.String Javadoc. java.lang.String Javadoc unnecessarily locks down the implementation details for String concat (e.g. usage of StringBuilder): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8155215/webrev.00/ I'll submit CCC as soon as we agree on wording. Thanks, -Aleksey
On 4/27/16 3:33 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
Hi,
Please review this tiny spec improvement that syncs up JLS and java.lang.String Javadoc. java.lang.String Javadoc unnecessarily locks down the implementation details for String concat (e.g. usage of StringBuilder): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8155215/webrev.00/
I'll submit CCC as soon as we agree on wording.
Thanks, -Aleksey
looks good.
On 27 Apr 2016, at 11:33, Aleksey Shipilev <aleksey.shipilev@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi,
Please review this tiny spec improvement that syncs up JLS and java.lang.String Javadoc. java.lang.String Javadoc unnecessarily locks down the implementation details for String concat (e.g. usage of StringBuilder): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8155215/webrev.00/
This looks good. Should is say “Java SE” API rather than “JDK API” ? -Chris.
On 04/27/2016 01:33 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
Please review this tiny spec improvement that syncs up JLS and java.lang.String Javadoc. java.lang.String Javadoc unnecessarily locks down the implementation details for String concat (e.g. usage of StringBuilder): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8155215/webrev.00/
I'll submit CCC as soon as we agree on wording.
Thanks for on-list and off-list reviews! Under Alex Buckley's guidance, we have arrived to this version, moving more to @implNote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8155215/webrev.02/ Cheers, -Aleksey
participants (3)
-
Aleksey Shipilev
-
Chris Hegarty
-
Xueming Shen