http://openjdk.java.net/guide/repositories.html#term
The repositories use following naming scheme:
|<release>/<project>{-gate}?/<component>|
where
/release/ :: the name of the release such as "jdk7" /project/ :: the name of an OpenJDK project <http://openjdk.java.net/projects/> such as "swing", "tl", or "modules" /component/ :: the name of a repository containing a logical subset of the code base such as "langtools"
"swing" and "tl" are not OpenJDK projects are they? They're certainly not listed under "Projects" in the list on the left of the page. "Integration-family or project", maybe? -- Jon
Hi, Jon.
"swing" and "tl" are not OpenJDK projects are they? They're certainly not listed under "Projects" in the list on the left of the page. "Integration-family or project", maybe?
Yes, this is a problem. The provided naming scheme reflects the discussion we had when the repositories were originally being discussed/designed. The actual names "swing", "tl", etc. reflect the historical names of the integration units as somewhat defined by our org structure. I like your suggestion. Let me see how changing to "integration family" plays out in the rest of the document, before I commit to it. iris
participants (2)
-
iris clark
-
Jonathan Gibbons