29 Oct
2020
29 Oct
'20
2:22 p.m.
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:56:20 GMT, Kim Barrett <kbarrett@openjdk.org> wrote:
Please review this trivial fix of the second argument in a call to MonitorLocker::wait. Because the locker is constructed as no-safepoint-checking, the improper second argument is ignored rather than possibly going into an unexpected state.
Looks good! ------------- Marked as reviewed by sjohanss (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/934