Hi All, Does anyone here think this list should/shouldn't be archived? I mean that in a nice way, as I don't want to pursue archiving a list if people are still using it, or plan to. More details on this list-archiving push here: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8220662 List owners were contacted 3 weeks ago, and this is a follow-up for lists whose owners haven't replied yet. Best Regards Adam Farley IBM Runtimes
* Adam Farley8:
I mean that in a nice way, as I don't want to pursue archiving a list if people are still using it, or plan to.
What's a good way to stay informed about new JEPs and changes to existing JEPs? This list is obviously unused, so it can be archived, but I wonder what the replacement is. Thanks, Florian
That's a very good question. platform-jep-discuss, maybe? Though that does seem quite dormant. Maybe someone in the discuss list will know. I'll shoot them a message and cc you. Best Regards Adam Farley IBM Runtimes Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote on 07/05/2019 18:22:10:
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley@uk.ibm.com> Cc: jep-changes@openjdk.java.net Date: 07/05/2019 18:22 Subject: Re: jep-changes: Should this list be archived?
* Adam Farley8:
I mean that in a nice way, as I don't want to pursue archiving a list if people are still using it, or plan to.
What's a good way to stay informed about new JEPs and changes to existing JEPs?
This list is obviously unused, so it can be archived, but I wonder what the replacement is.
Thanks, Florian
Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
participants (2)
-
Adam Farley8
-
Florian Weimer