Hi Martin, I noticed that the changeset JDK-8188868 [1] also needs load_perm() and vec_prem(), which are added in another changeset "8185979: PPC64: Implement SHA2 intrinsic" [2]. I'm sorry, but I forgot about these two functions when I posted my RFR. The issue is that applying [2] causes a long chain of dependency, as shown below in depending order, and it eventually reached two changesets [5][6] that seem to be difficult to backport to JDK8. [5] is for the compact string feature, which is not supported in JDK8, and [6] is a big bundle of changes. Is it acceptable as a back port process to cherry pick a few methods from a dependent changeset, instead of applying whole changeset? Possible candidates of cherry picking are: 1. Pick load_perm() and vec_perm() from [2] 2. Pick vst() and vsix() from [3], and apply [2] 3. Pick has_vsx() and vsr[abst]() from [4], and apply [3] and above 4. Pick has_mfdscr() from [5] and config_dscr() from [6], and apply [4] and above. I appreciate your suggestion. [1] 8188868: PPC64: Support AES intrinsics on Big Endian http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/9d337e48b178 [2] 8185979: PPC64: Implement SHA2 intrinsic http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/f4962ab855b6 [3] 8185969: PPC64: Improve VSR support to use up to 64 registers http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/057f21a10f5f [4] 8154156: PPC64: improve array copy stubs by using vector instructions http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/c9d756fa846e [5] 8149655: PPC64: Implement CompactString intrinsics http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/6241574f5982 [6] 8077838: Recent developments for ppc. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/c703c89fddbf Regards, Ogata "hotspot-compiler-dev" <hotspot-compiler-dev-bounces@openjdk.java.net> wrote on 2018/11/19 18:12:45:
From: "Kazunori Ogata" <OGATAK@jp.ibm.com> To: "Doerr, Martin" <martin.doerr@sap.com> Cc: "hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.java.net" <hotspot-compiler- dev@openjdk.java.net>, "ppc-aix-port-dev@openjdk.java.net" <ppc-aix-port- dev@openjdk.java.net> Date: 2018/11/19 18:16 Subject: RE: [8u] RFR for backport of JDK-8188868: PPC64: Support AES intrinsics on Big Endian Sent by: "hotspot-compiler-dev" <hotspot-compiler-dev-bounces@openjdk.java.net>
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your comment. I see. I'll backport JDK-8185975 first.
Please don't forget to test the debug build. Yes, I'll test both debug and release builds.
Regards, Ogata
From: "Doerr, Martin" <martin.doerr@sap.com> To: Kazunori Ogata <OGATAK@jp.ibm.com>, "hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.java.net" <hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.java.net>, "ppc-aix-port-dev@openjdk.java.net" <ppc-aix-port-dev@openjdk.java.net> Date: 2018/11/19 17:56 Subject: RE: [8u] RFR for backport of JDK-8188868: PPC64: Support
AES intrinsics on Big Endian
Hi Ogata,
you need to backport JDK-8185975 before you can use +8 instead of -8. Please don't forget to test the debug build.
Best regards, Martin
-----Original Message----- From: hotspot-compiler-dev <hotspot-compiler-dev-bounces@openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of Kazunori Ogata Sent: Montag, 19. November 2018 09:28 To: hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.java.net; ppc-aix-port-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: [8u] RFR for backport of JDK-8188868: PPC64: Support AES intrinsics on Big Endian
Hi,
May I get reviews for enhancement backport of JDK-8188868: PPC64: Support AES intrinsics on Big Endian?
INVALID URI REMOVED u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Ehorii_jdk8u-5Faes-5Fbe_8188868_webrev. 00_&d=DwIFAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=p-
FJcrbNvnCOLkbIdmQ2tigCrcpdU77tlI2EIdaEcJw&m=BqxW_dQ87Y0TOxyOjkH6hFZIIrhwH2ycEWJdxSDcAeQ&s=ulzXDyQq40EaguNM-
svdR9rWGZnClO3c3d_41XGFuHg&e=
There is no code change except for an immediate parameter of vsldoi (-8 in
jdk8u was changed to 8 to match with the latest code), besides the difference of directory tree structure.
Since not a small number of customers are still using jdk8, especially in AIX, JDK-8188868 is important for them to improve performance of secure network transportation.
Regards, Ogata