Hi Goetz, I'm a bit confused :-/ On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 12:39 +0000, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
Hi Severin,
here for example: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2015-July/015370.html
As far as I can see that was relating to the JDK-head fix which wasn't available at the time (July vs. pushed in Dec). The original review thread was here: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2015-December/016103.html JDK-8073139 has been fixed in JDK 9+ since December 14, 2015.
While the fix proposed there looks different and the downport was never finished.
FWIW, this is a review request for the 8u backport :) Thanks, Severin
Best regards, Goetz.
-----Original Message----- From: Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@redhat.com> Sent: Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2018 13:09 To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier@sap.com>; Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson@oracle.com>; hotspot-dev <hotspot- dev@openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port-dev <ppc-aix-port- dev@openjdk.java.net>; build-dev <build-dev@openjdk.java.net> Subject: Re: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling
Hi Goetz,
On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 10:40 +0000, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
Hi,
I'm fine with this.
Thanks for the review!
If I remember correctly, this was proposed before but never pushed in the end.
Interesting.
Did you test this on ppc64 be, too?
I have not. Will do so, though.
Thanks, Severin
Best regards, Goetz.
-----Original Message----- From: ppc-aix-port-dev <ppc-aix-port-dev-bounces@openjdk.java.net>
On
Behalf Of Severin Gehwolf Sent: Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2018 12:34 To: Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson@oracle.com>; hotspot-dev <hotspot- dev@openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port-dev <ppc-aix-port- dev@openjdk.java.net>; build-dev <build-dev@openjdk.java.net> Subject: Re: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory
and
os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling
Hi,
Pinging PPC porters. Does this look reasonable to you?
Thanks, Severin
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 08:56 -0700, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Build changes look ok to me.
/Erik
On 2018-09-26 04:26, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
Hi,
Could I please get reviews for this JDK 8 backport which fixes some tooling issues on Linux ppc64le? Prior this patch, a ppc64le build would report as "ppc64" via os.arch system property which breaks tooling such as maven in as much as if some dependency needs
native
libraries it would download BE binaries where it actually should download LE binaries. Example for os.arch/java.library.path:
pre: $ ./jdk8-pre-ppc64le/bin/java TestProperty java.library.path =
/usr/java/packages/lib/ppc64:/usr/lib64:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib
os.arch = ppc64
post: $ ./jdk8-post-ppc64le/bin/java TestProperty java.library.path =
/usr/java/packages/lib/ppc64le:/usr/lib64:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib
os.arch = ppc64le
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073139 webrevs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-
8073139/jdk8/01/
Including build-dev for build changes. hotspot-dev and ppc-aix-port-
dev
for JDK/hotspot changes.
This backport should only have minor differences to the changes in
JDK
11. We have been using similar patches in Fedora for months.
Thoughts?
Thanks, Severin