Draft JEP: JDK Core Libraries Test Stabilization
Hi all, It might be of interest to this group that I've posted a draft JEP about core libraries test stabilization (that is, fixing up the spuriously-failing tests) to core-libs-dev@openjdk. See the following message: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-May/026703.html Followup discussion should be on core-libs-dev. s'marks
Hi Stuart, Thanks for the pointer, very interested in having stable tests as we publish the results ever more frequently ! cc'ing the adoption group. Rgds,Rory On 01/05/2014 01:14, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
It might be of interest to this group that I've posted a draft JEP about core libraries test stabilization (that is, fixing up the spuriously-failing tests) to core-libs-dev@openjdk. See the following message:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-May/026703.html
Followup discussion should be on core-libs-dev.
s'marks
-- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
Really happy to see this happening - @Stuart - if the bugs can all be tagged in a particular way then perhaps it's a good target for the Adoption Group in their hackdays (assuming some of the tests can be reproduced on our platforms) Cheers, Martijn On 1 May 2014 09:08, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland < rory.odonnell@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Thanks for the pointer, very interested in having stable tests as we publish the results ever more frequently ! cc'ing the adoption group.
Rgds,Rory
On 01/05/2014 01:14, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
It might be of interest to this group that I've posted a draft JEP about core libraries test stabilization (that is, fixing up the spuriously-failing tests) to core-libs-dev@openjdk. See the following message:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-May/026703.html
Followup discussion should be on core-libs-dev.
s'marks
-- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
On 01/05/2014 10:15, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Really happy to see this happening - @Stuart - if the bugs can all be tagged in a particular way then perhaps it's a good target for the Adoption Group in their hackdays (assuming some of the tests can be reproduced on our platforms)
They should all have the "teststabilization" label so this should list them: project = jdk and resolution = unresolved AND labels = teststabilization There is also a dashboard created but I don't know if it is shared so that everyone can access it (the raw data is just the above filter). https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12806 -Alan.
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman@oracle.com> wrote:
On 01/05/2014 10:15, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Really happy to see this happening - @Stuart - if the bugs can all be tagged in a particular way then perhaps it's a good target for the Adoption Group in their hackdays (assuming some of the tests can be reproduced on our platforms)
They should all have the "teststabilization" label so this should list them: project = jdk and resolution = unresolved AND labels = teststabilization
There is also a dashboard created but I don't know if it is shared so that everyone can access it (the raw data is just the above filter). https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12806
No, it's not visible from outside Oracle (even if logged in into the Java Bug System).
-Alan.
participants (5)
-
Alan Bateman
-
Martijn Verburg
-
Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland
-
Stuart Marks
-
Volker Simonis