[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Still waiting for review

[Alexey Ushakov]

Hi Mark,

Please, read my comments about your patch.

Sorry Martin, looks like this issue isn't yours.

Best Regards,
Alexey
 
Alexey Ushakov wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I'm currently looking into
> http://www.jroller.com/dgilbert/entry/jfreechart_and_jxlayer
>   
> issue and your patch. Unfortunately we're all working in parallel on 
> many different project, so I'm unable to dedicate all my time for this 
> task.  Currently, I did verify that your fix does solve the problem 
> but need more time to go through all the details of pisces AA engine 
> to be sure that everything is OK. I'll let you know about any progress 
> on this.
>
> Best Regards,
> Alexey
>
> Martin von Gagern wrote:
>> Hi Igor,
>>
>> thanks for your status update.
>>
>> Igor Nekrestyanov wrote:
>>   
>>> My understanding of current situation with Martin's fixes is the following:
>>>  - for 2 of Martin's fixes internal formal review procedure is in progress
>>>    (we do review all changes and save approved webrevs and this is
>>>    another reason why we ask for webrevs for contributions)
>>>    Unfortunately this procedure is not public and therefore it is hard
>>>    to track it status. However, it should not take long.
>>>     
>>
>> A short mail saying "Hi, I'm <youNameHere>, I'll now start to review
>> this and get back to you when I have questions or reached a verdict"
>> would be a first step towards tracking that state, until more elaborate
>> tracking tools and mechanisms become available.
>>
>>   
>>>  - one of the suggested fixes actually introduces incompatibility in the
>>>    behavior
>>>    and such change has to be reviewed by CCC committee (this is how we
>>>    call it internally,
>>>    not sure what will be public name when it become public process)
>>>    [My understanding of incompatibility is: metadata written by "fixed"
>>>    jdk will not be parsed normally by older jdk]
>>>     
>>
>> Thanks, I'll look at this again, see if I have improvements or
>> additional information to add regarding this. If so, I'll use the
>> appropriate thread.
>>
>>   
>>>   Andrew Brygin (who actually works on these 3 submissions) will provide
>>> more accurate details about these 3 bugs later today.
>>>     
>>
>> Great! Looking forward to that.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>   
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/attachments/20081208/5b730168/attachment.html>