[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [RFC]: 7049339

[Phil Race]

As a matter of book keeping I notice that 7049339 was recently closed as 
a duplicate of 6775390.
So really this should have been pushed under 6775390 which I think had 
the better explanation too
as well as being the original report. It also had a ready made test case 
that probably could have been used.
And I verified your fix fixes that test case.
But since the fix was pushed under 7049339  I will swap that around, 
closing 6775390 as a dup. of 7049339.

-phil.


On 6/24/2011 1:52 PM, Denis Lila wrote:
>> Hi Denis,
>>
>> Looks good to me!
> Thanks Jim!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>> ...jim
>>
>> On 6/24/2011 10:19 AM, Denis Lila wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I think this webrev:
>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/~dlila/webrevs/Bug7049339/
>>> fixes 7049339 and I would like to commit it.
>>>
>>> At the very least it fixes batik-squiggle printing
>>> and the included regression test.
>>>
>>> Any comments are appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Denis.