[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [RFC]: 7049339

[Denis Lila]

> As a matter of book keeping I notice that 7049339 was recently closed
> as a duplicate of 6775390.
> So really this should have been pushed under 6775390 which I think had
> the better explanation too as well as being the original report.

Sorry about that. I checked 7049339 before pushing, and it hadn't been
closed yet.

> It also had a ready made test case that probably could have been used.
> And I verified your fix fixes that test case.

I see there was also a fix posted for it, nearly identical to mine.
Why wasn't that commited?

> But since the fix was pushed under 7049339 I will swap that around,
> closing 6775390 as a dup. of 7049339.

Thank you,
Denis.

----- Original Message -----

> 
> -phil.
> 
> 
> On 6/24/2011 1:52 PM, Denis Lila wrote:
> >> Hi Denis,
> >>
> >> Looks good to me!
> > Thanks Jim!
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >> ...jim
> >>
> >> On 6/24/2011 10:19 AM, Denis Lila wrote:
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> I think this webrev:
> >>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/~dlila/webrevs/Bug7049339/
> >>> fixes 7049339 and I would like to commit it.
> >>>
> >>> At the very least it fixes batik-squiggle printing
> >>> and the included regression test.
> >>>
> >>> Any comments are appreciated.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>> Denis.