[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [RFC]: 7049339

[Phil Race]

On 6/24/2011 2:23 PM, Denis Lila wrote:
>> As a matter of book keeping I notice that 7049339 was recently closed
>> as a duplicate of 6775390.
>> So really this should have been pushed under 6775390 which I think had
>> the better explanation too as well as being the original report.
> Sorry about that. I checked 7049339 before pushing, and it hadn't been
> closed yet.

It was closed on 3rd June but you are right that for some reason 
bugs.sun.com
is still showing it as accepted.  I thought that was cured by now. In 
any case
I wasn't really expecting you'd have noticed all this,  just pointing 
out a few
things for the record

>> It also had a ready made test case that probably could have been used.
>> And I verified your fix fixes that test case.
> I see there was also a fix posted for it, nearly identical to mine.
> Why wasn't that commited?

A very reasonable question and I can only suppose that it was filed as a 
P4 (low priority)
bug,. the submitter never followed up on the email list, and the Resp. 
Eng. never got around
to reviewing it.

-phil.
>> But since the fix was pushed under 7049339 I will swap that around,
>> closing 6775390 as a dup. of 7049339.
> Thank you,
> Denis.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>> -phil.
>>
>>
>> On 6/24/2011 1:52 PM, Denis Lila wrote:
>>>> Hi Denis,
>>>>
>>>> Looks good to me!
>>> Thanks Jim!
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>
>>>> ...jim
>>>>
>>>> On 6/24/2011 10:19 AM, Denis Lila wrote:
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this webrev:
>>>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/~dlila/webrevs/Bug7049339/
>>>>> fixes 7049339 and I would like to commit it.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the very least it fixes batik-squiggle printing
>>>>> and the included regression test.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any comments are appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Denis.