[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request for review: updated 2 files to use generic type

[Sean Chou]

Sorry for the wrong forest.

I don't think it has practical value. In fact, the patch is not newly
created. I saw it contained some modification from wild to generic format,
so tidied it up to see if it is liked.


On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Phil Race <philip.race at oracle.com> wrote:

>  You are still generating a patch against the T+L forest.
> For 2D fixes it should be generated against the 2D forest.
>
> I don't see a lot of value in generification to Object .. is there
> some practical value to this ?
>
> -phil.
>
>
> On 6/21/12 1:36 AM, Sean Chou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>       Any one would like to take a look at this ?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sean Chou <zhouyx at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:00 PM
> Subject: Request for review: updated 2 files to use generic type
> To: 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>      I updated 2 files(src/share/classes/sun/font/StrikeCache.java,
> src/share/classes/sun/java2d/Disposer.java) to use generic type, and
> updated several old version generic to diamond(<>), a type from Object to
> Void ; and by the way an invocation to a static method.
>
>      In order to get a ReferenceQueue<object> in StrikeCache.java
> I changed the return type of Disposer.getQueue from ReferenceQueue to
> ReferenceQueue<Object> .
>
>      The webrev is at:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhouyx/OJDK-389/webrev.01/   .
>
>  Some comments collected as I didn't send the mail to the right mailing
> list:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-May/010103.html
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2012-June/002589.html
>
>
>
>  --
> Best Regards,
> Sean Chou
>
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Sean Chou
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/attachments/20120621/84a04c1e/attachment.html>