[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Remove including of link.h to improve portability

Igor Nekrestyanov igor.nekrestyanov at oracle.com
Wed Mar 21 15:54:34 UTC 2012


still seem ok to me.

-igor

On 3/21/12 1:17 AM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
> Hi, the original patch was not rebased to the latest 2d code, here's 
> the rebased patch.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/7152519_2/jdk.patch
>
> Regards!
>
> - Jonathan
>
> On 03/21/2012 07:37 AM, Igor Nekrestyanov wrote:
>> Looks fine to me.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On 3/20/12 3:30 PM, Phil Race wrote:
>>> I'm (still) OK with this .. one other reviewer please somebody.
>>>
>>> -phil.
>>>
>>> On 3/20/2012 1:37 AM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>>>> Hello, could anyone please help to take a look at this splitted patch?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> -Jonathan
>>>>
>>>> 2012/3/13 Jonathan Lu <luchsh at linux.vnet.ibm.com 
>>>> <mailto:luchsh at linux.vnet.ibm.com>>
>>>>
>>>>     Hi Phil,
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks a lot for the review and testing, I've splited the patch
>>>>     into two parts, one for 2D repository and another for TL. Here's
>>>>     the patch for 2D repository:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/7152519/
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eluchsh/7152519/>
>>>>
>>>>     So could anybody please help to do another review?
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks a lot!
>>>>
>>>>     - Jonathan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 03/13/2012 02:22 AM, Phil Race wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         I added two of those includes myself I believe and I doubt I
>>>>         did it unless needed
>>>>         and others apparently found it necessary too. So we need to be
>>>>         sure this is OK.
>>>>         However at least one of those I added dates back to Solaris 8
>>>>         being the build platform
>>>>         so maybe its no longer needed.
>>>>
>>>>         I ran the patch through our internal jprt build system on all
>>>>         platforms which
>>>>         for Solaris uses a recent Solaris 10 update and it built fine.
>>>>         I didn't notice
>>>>         any new warnings on the files I know anything about.
>>>>
>>>> > 7152519
>>>>         It was incorrectly submitted as awt, I moved it to 2D.
>>>>
>>>>         But I think you should split this into 2 patches.
>>>>         The above bug can be used for all the 2D ones and push to 2d.
>>>>
>>>>         The other one for the nio and security patches can go to the
>>>>         "tl" repo.
>>>>
>>>>         -phil.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On 3/11/2012 8:29 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Bug 7152519 has been created for this patch.
>>>>
>>>>             - Jonathan
>>>>
>>>>             On 03/09/2012 07:49 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Hello 2d-dev,
>>>>
>>>>                 I find that link.h is included in several place of
>>>>                 OpenJDK code, mostly together with dlfcn.h, but this
>>>>                 caused portability problem in my testing on some Unix
>>>>                 platforms, such as AIX.
>>>>                 So far as I see OpenJDK only makes use of basic
>>>>                 POSIX.1-2001 compatible dynamic library manipulation
>>>>                 functions, such as dlopen, dlclose, dlsym, dlerr
>>>>                 functions, no other extensions found, so is link.h
>>>>                 still neccessary for current implementation? because
>>>>                 link.h is not found in the c-POSIX standard headers
>>>>                 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_POSIX_library) and I
>>>>                 think this removal will be an enhancement for
>>>>                 portability, does that make sense?
>>>>
>>>>                 Here's the proposed patch, since most parts of it are
>>>>                 from Java2d so I post it here for discussion.
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/remove_link_h/
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eluchsh/remove_link_h/>
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eluchsh/remove_link_h/>
>>>>
>>>>                 And one more question, in
>>>>                 src/solaris/native/sun/java2d/x11/XRBackendNative.c I
>>>>                 found following comments
>>>>                  #ifdef __solaris__
>>>>                  /* Solaris 10 will not have these symbols at 
>>>> runtime */
>>>>                  #include <link.h>
>>>>
>>>>                 And in src/solaris/native/sun/awt/fontpath.c,
>>>>                  #include <dlfcn.h>
>>>>                  #ifndef __linux__ /* i.e. is solaris */
>>>>                  #include <link.h>
>>>>                  #endif
>>>>
>>>>                 I've built successfully on Ubuntu 11.10 32bit and
>>>>                 OpenSolaris Express 2010.11 x86, the patch seems to be
>>>>                 OK, but does anybody know the situation on Solaris
>>>>                 (e.g. Solaris 10) of this problem?
>>>>                 I assume it will also comply with POSIX.1-2001
>>>>                 standard, and provide all the required functions in
>>>>                 dlfcn.h, right?
>>>>
>>>>                 Cheers!
>>>>                 - Jonathan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>




More information about the 2d-dev mailing list