[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Remove including of link.h to improve portability
Igor Nekrestyanov
igor.nekrestyanov at oracle.com
Wed Mar 21 15:54:34 UTC 2012
still seem ok to me.
-igor
On 3/21/12 1:17 AM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
> Hi, the original patch was not rebased to the latest 2d code, here's
> the rebased patch.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/7152519_2/jdk.patch
>
> Regards!
>
> - Jonathan
>
> On 03/21/2012 07:37 AM, Igor Nekrestyanov wrote:
>> Looks fine to me.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On 3/20/12 3:30 PM, Phil Race wrote:
>>> I'm (still) OK with this .. one other reviewer please somebody.
>>>
>>> -phil.
>>>
>>> On 3/20/2012 1:37 AM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>>>> Hello, could anyone please help to take a look at this splitted patch?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> -Jonathan
>>>>
>>>> 2012/3/13 Jonathan Lu <luchsh at linux.vnet.ibm.com
>>>> <mailto:luchsh at linux.vnet.ibm.com>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Phil,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for the review and testing, I've splited the patch
>>>> into two parts, one for 2D repository and another for TL. Here's
>>>> the patch for 2D repository:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/7152519/
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eluchsh/7152519/>
>>>>
>>>> So could anybody please help to do another review?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>
>>>> - Jonathan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/13/2012 02:22 AM, Phil Race wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I added two of those includes myself I believe and I doubt I
>>>> did it unless needed
>>>> and others apparently found it necessary too. So we need to be
>>>> sure this is OK.
>>>> However at least one of those I added dates back to Solaris 8
>>>> being the build platform
>>>> so maybe its no longer needed.
>>>>
>>>> I ran the patch through our internal jprt build system on all
>>>> platforms which
>>>> for Solaris uses a recent Solaris 10 update and it built fine.
>>>> I didn't notice
>>>> any new warnings on the files I know anything about.
>>>>
>>>> > 7152519
>>>> It was incorrectly submitted as awt, I moved it to 2D.
>>>>
>>>> But I think you should split this into 2 patches.
>>>> The above bug can be used for all the 2D ones and push to 2d.
>>>>
>>>> The other one for the nio and security patches can go to the
>>>> "tl" repo.
>>>>
>>>> -phil.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/11/2012 8:29 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Bug 7152519 has been created for this patch.
>>>>
>>>> - Jonathan
>>>>
>>>> On 03/09/2012 07:49 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello 2d-dev,
>>>>
>>>> I find that link.h is included in several place of
>>>> OpenJDK code, mostly together with dlfcn.h, but this
>>>> caused portability problem in my testing on some Unix
>>>> platforms, such as AIX.
>>>> So far as I see OpenJDK only makes use of basic
>>>> POSIX.1-2001 compatible dynamic library manipulation
>>>> functions, such as dlopen, dlclose, dlsym, dlerr
>>>> functions, no other extensions found, so is link.h
>>>> still neccessary for current implementation? because
>>>> link.h is not found in the c-POSIX standard headers
>>>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_POSIX_library) and I
>>>> think this removal will be an enhancement for
>>>> portability, does that make sense?
>>>>
>>>> Here's the proposed patch, since most parts of it are
>>>> from Java2d so I post it here for discussion.
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/remove_link_h/
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eluchsh/remove_link_h/>
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eluchsh/remove_link_h/>
>>>>
>>>> And one more question, in
>>>> src/solaris/native/sun/java2d/x11/XRBackendNative.c I
>>>> found following comments
>>>> #ifdef __solaris__
>>>> /* Solaris 10 will not have these symbols at
>>>> runtime */
>>>> #include <link.h>
>>>>
>>>> And in src/solaris/native/sun/awt/fontpath.c,
>>>> #include <dlfcn.h>
>>>> #ifndef __linux__ /* i.e. is solaris */
>>>> #include <link.h>
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> I've built successfully on Ubuntu 11.10 32bit and
>>>> OpenSolaris Express 2010.11 x86, the patch seems to be
>>>> OK, but does anybody know the situation on Solaris
>>>> (e.g. Solaris 10) of this problem?
>>>> I assume it will also comply with POSIX.1-2001
>>>> standard, and provide all the required functions in
>>>> dlfcn.h, right?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers!
>>>> - Jonathan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the 2d-dev
mailing list