[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Fix proposal for 9001948: UnixPrintServiceLookup not returning consistent values

[Phil Race]

That's a Java incident number, not a JDK bug number.
JDK numbers begin with "JDK-8", incident numbers begin with "JI-9"
I imagine jcheck will reject use of that number - it should !
I asked Jennifer to look into this right after you first posted.
Jennifer ?

Off hand I'm not sure I like the proposed patch since it seems to ignore
the point of the existing comment at lines 359-362 ..

-phil.

On 4/22/2013 9:42 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> Hi Phil
>
> I just submitted the bug description yesterday again and now recveived 
> a number:
>
> 9001948
>
> I guess the first time it somehow did not work. I already adjusted the 
> test in ny fix proposal:
>
> http://reinharts.dyndns.org/webrev
>
> Cheers Patrick
>
> Am 22.04.2013 um 23:13 schrieb Jim Graham <james.graham at oracle.com 
> <mailto:james.graham at oracle.com>>:
>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> Since the fix involves printing it may be better to work through Phil 
>> Race since that is more his area.  He can hook you up with the 
>> necessary "paperwork" and review/integrate your fixes...
>>
>>           ...jim
>>
>> On 4/18/13 11:18 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> I'm new on this list and would like to submit a fix. Unfortunately I 
>>> did not received the bug number for my submitted problem, where I 
>>> think I got a fix for.
>>>
>>> Could you help me on this?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> Am 17.04.2013 um 22:11 schrieb Patrick Reinhart <patrick at reini.net 
>>> <mailto:patrick at reini.net>>:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 14:15 +0200, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here's the link to suggested fix:
>>>>
>>>> http://reinharts.dyndns.org/webrev/
>>>>
>>>> Cheers Patrick