[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <AWT Dev> [9] Review Request: JDK-8029455 JLightweightFrame: support scaled painting

Anton V. Tarasov anton.tarasov at oracle.com
Wed Dec 18 09:38:00 UTC 2013


On 18.12.2013 13:25, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for noticing (sorry, but I simply forgot to check we don't export the buffer...) What can 
> we do about that? I have the following thoughts:
>
> 1) We can warn developers to be ready for a HiDPI raster when they call that method under the 
> following conditions: 1) the interop mode, 2) MacOSX 3) a Retina display.
> 2) In case the method is called, we can create a "shadow  buffer" and start to sync it with the 
> main buffer. The main buffer will be scaled to the shadow buffer on every repaint cycle.

Just wanted to add, that SunVolatileImage.getSnapshot does the same (it scales the volatile image to 
a buffer), however it doesn't need to keep it synchronised...

Thanks,
Anton.


> 3) We can introduce an internal property which will switch on/off the 2nd scenario. For instance, 
> a developer may ask for the buffer and don't bother about its hidpi raster.
>
> Yes, I understand the solutions are far from perfect, but please take into account, the interop is 
> a special mode where we (and developers) should be ready for compromises...
>
> What do you think? Do you have any better solutions in mind?
>
> Thanks,
> Anton.
>
>
> On 18.12.2013 5:03, Jim Graham wrote:
>> Hi Anton,
>>
>> javax.swing.RepaintManager.getOffscreenBuffer is a public method that can now return one of the 
>> new HiDPI offscreen images which is a subclass of BufferedImage.  This was what I was worried 
>> about in terms of one of these internal double buffers leaking to developer code.  If they test 
>> the image using instanceof they will see that it is a BufferdImage and they may try to dig out 
>> the raster and get confused...
>>
>>             ...jim
>>
>> On 12/17/13 10:21 AM, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please look at the new version:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8029455/webrev.2
>>>
>>> It contains the following changes:
>>>
>>> - All the scale related stuff is moved to the new class:
>>> OffScreenHiDPIImage.java
>>>
>>> - JViewport and RepaintManager no longer cache buffers.
>>>
>>> - JLightweightFrame has new method: createHiDPIImage(w, h).
>>>
>>> - JViewport, RepaintManager and AbstractRegionPainter goes the new path
>>> to create a HiDPI buffered image.
>>>
>>> - A new internal property is added: "swing.jlf.hidpiImageEnabled". False
>>> by default. It makes JLF.createImage(w, h) forward the call to
>>> JLF.createHiDPIImage(w, h). This can be used by a third party code in
>>> case it creates a buffered image via Component.createImage(w, h) and
>>> uses the image so that it can benefit from being a HiDPI image on a
>>> Retina display.
>>>
>>> For instance, SwingSet2 has an animating Bezier curve demo. Switching
>>> the property on makes the curve auto scale smoothly. Please, look at the
>>> screenshots:
>>>
>>> -- http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8029455/RoughtCurve.png
>>> -- http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8029455/SmoothCurve.png
>>>
>>> - SunGraphics2D now draws a HiDPI buffered image the same way it draws a
>>> VolatileImage.
>>>
>>> - I've removed the copyArea() method from the BufImgSurfaceData, and
>>> modified the original version. The only question I have is: do I need to
>>> check for "instanceof OffScreenHiDPIImage.SurfaceData" in case when
>>> "transformState == TRANSFORM_TRANSLATESCALE"? If this method is invoked
>>> with some other SD, and the transform is SCALE, will it do the job with
>>> the coordinates conversion done?
>>>
>>> - I've left the new methods in FramePeer default... May yet we implement
>>> them in other peers when we really need it?
>>>
>>> - CPlatformLWWindow.getGraphicsDevice() checks for an intersection +
>>> scale. This heuristic actually may fail when a Window is moved b/w three
>>> or four displays so that it intersects them all at some time. JFX will
>>> set a new scale factor in between and AWT may pick up a wrong device. I
>>> don't know any simple solution for that. For two monitors this will work.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Anton.
>




More information about the 2d-dev mailing list