[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Won't fix https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8069312 ??
Phil Race
philip.race at oracle.com
Tue Mar 24 17:28:18 UTC 2015
> i.e is it still JBS but there is some other target release value that
should be being used ?
It seems that question has been answered in the link Dalibor sent : its
"openjdk7u"
for the release.
-phil.
On 3/24/2015 10:16 AM, Phil Race wrote:
> I think this is a round-about way of saying that Oracle is moving
> its OpenJDK efforts off 7 to focus on just jdk8u and jdk9 and
> the sustaining engineering group won't be proactively backporting
> it to any Oracle JDK7 update release, which is probably just security
> releases going forward.
>
> Now, since this regression was new in 7u65 I do think it important
> to fix in any 7 train that we might expect people to use .. so
> I am sure the new maintainer of openjdk 7 updates will be happy
> to let it in and perhaps it should have been fixed in 7-pool whatever
> that really means, but that's up to someone else.
>
> However I am not sure how the openjdk7 fixes will be tracked going
> forward
> i.e is it still JBS but there is some other target release value that
> should be being used ?
>
> -phil.
>
> On 3/24/2015 9:24 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 16:56 +0100, dalibor topic wrote:
>>> On 24.03.2015 16:35, Mario Torre wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I just received some emails related to the backports of bug
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067364
>>>>
>>>> I've seen in particular JDK-8069312 is being closed as "Won't Fix".
>>> Fix version for that issue is '7-pool'. That means the fix won't be
>>> backported to OpenJDK 7u.
>> But we said the next maintainer would be responsible to decide this so
>> the fix was just in hold for now, then why "won't fix"? Am I missing
>> something?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mario
>>
>>
>
More information about the 2d-dev
mailing list