[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] RFR: JDK-6529030, , Java Printing: Print range > Selection gets enabled
prasanta sadhukhan
prasanta.sadhukhan at oracle.com
Wed Apr 13 11:17:53 UTC 2016
Hi Phil,
On 4/13/2016 4:52 AM, Phil Race wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My reading here :
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms646843%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
>
>
> of the meaning of PD_NOSELECTION is that it disables the SELECTION
> radio button such
> that the user *cannot* select it.
>
> Is that true ?
Yes, PD_NOSELECTION will disable SELECTION radio button.
> If so this seems like it cannot be the right fix for this issue
> and I am not sure why getSelectAttrib() would want to return that.
protected final int getSelectAttrib() {
if (attributes != null) {
SunPageSelection pages =
(SunPageSelection)attributes.get(SunPageSelection.class);
if (pages == SunPageSelection.RANGE) {
return PD_PAGENUMS;
} else if (pages == SunPageSelection.SELECTION) {
return PD_SELECTION;
} else if (pages == SunPageSelection.ALL) {
return PD_ALLPAGES;
}
}
return PD_NOSELECTION;
}
so if SunPageSelection is not added to attribute which was the case in
1st instance so PD_NOSELECTION is returned
and we have in awt_PrintControl.cpp#InitPrintDialog()
if (selectType != 0) { selectType will be 4 for PD_NOSELECTION so
pd.Flags will be set and Selection radio button is disabled in 1st instance
pd.Flags |= selectType;
}
> Perhaps we never in practice return PD_NOSELECTION ?
>
> I am also unsure what it means to set flags to PD_NOSELECTION |
> PD_SELECTION
> as the windows docs don't tell me enough.
It will still disable SELECTION radio button.
>
> Maybe what we want is just that we do not cause PD_SELECTION to be set
> rather than setting PD_NOSELECTION.
>
I have modified the webrev to not set PD_NOSELECTION if
getSelectAttrib() returns NOSELECTION so it will mean Selection
radiobutton will be enabled now but will not be selected UNLESS user
selects
job.setDefaultSelection(JobAttributes.DefaultSelectionType.SELECTION)
explicitly in the application.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/6529030/webrev.01/
Also, I added @requires (os.family == windows) tag to make sure the test
is run on windows only as in linux, osx we do not get the "selection"
option [only All and Page range] for this test.
Regards
Prasanta
> But to decide what to do I need to know the real effect of
> PD_NOSELECTION.
>
> BTW about the test: you should make sure that the instructions are
> valid on OS X and Linux ..
>
> -phil.
>
> On 04/06/2016 03:09 AM, prasanta sadhukhan wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Please review a fix for jdk9.
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6529030
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/6529030/webrev.00/
>>
>> The issue was when using java.awt.print.PrinterJob instance more then
>> once, Selection radio button in Print dialog gets enabled from 2nd
>> instance even though we are printing "All" pages
>> however Selection radio button is disabled in the first instance.
>> This is seen in windows.
>>
>> This is because initially when windows initialized the print dialog,
>> it calls InitPrintDialog() which calls getSelectAttrib() to find out
>> which selection attribute user has selected.
>> getSelectAttrib() returns PD_NOSELECTION as SunPageSelection.class
>> was not added to attribute.
>> So, in InitPrintDialog() we set PRINTDLG flags to PD_NOSELECTION. So,
>> we see "Selection " radio button is disabled in 1st instance of print
>> dialog.
>> Now, when user presses "OK", windows native code calls
>> setNativeAttributes() and adds SunPageSelection.class to the
>> attribute with SunPageSelection.ALL or SunPageSelection.RANGE.
>>
>> When 2nd print dialog is shown, InitPrintDialog() will again call
>> getSelectAttrib() which will now return
>> SunPageSelection.ALL/SunPageSelection.RANGE which will be set to
>> PRINTDLG flag but
>> we are not disabling Selection radio button, so in 2nd instance,
>> Selection radio button gets enabled.
>>
>> Fix was to check if PD_SELECTION attribute is selected by user, if
>> not , sets PRINTDLG flag with PD_NOSELECTION.
>>
>> I have checked 8151590 and 8061267 works correctly with this patch.
>>
>> Regards
>> Prasanta
>
More information about the 2d-dev
mailing list