[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR 8154213: clean up uses of boxed primitive constructors in the java.desktop module

Sergey Bylokhov Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com
Mon Apr 25 15:34:29 UTC 2016


Some tweaks are possible also:
  - In some cases like in PrintServiceLookupProvider.java it is possible 
to use Integer.parseInt() instead of "Integer.valueOf()" + "intValue()".
  - It is also possible to use classes like Integer = GetIntegerAction() 
instead of "String = GetPropertyAction()".

On 25.04.16 8:11, prasanta sadhukhan wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> My 2 cents:
> JLayeredPane.java has typo Integer.valueOf.valueOf.
> In some cases, you have used
>
> Float.valueOf(xx) like in ServiceDialog.java, PNGImageDecoder.java
>
> but in some cases you jave used
>
> lmObj = lmVal; without using Float.valueOf(). Shouldn't we be consistent
> to use auto-boxing? Regards Prasanta
>
> On 4/22/2016 11:36 PM, Phil Race wrote:
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154213
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8154213/
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145468 has caused
>> the following constructors usages to be deprecated :
>> new Long(long) and new Integer(String)
>> new Integer(int) and new Integer(String)
>> new Float(int) and new Float(String)
>> new Double(int) and new Double(String)
>> new Character(char)
>>
>> The deprecations warnings were suppressed for the java.desktop module.
>>
>> This fix changes all uses in the java.desktop module to use
>> Foo.valueOf(..)
>> or in a few cases where we directly assign to a variable use auto-boxing.
>>
>> Additionally doc comments that use constructors were updated.
>>
>> Finally the deprecation suppression was removed.
>>
>> JPRT has been used to verify the build and I have run through the
>> various affected Swing L&Fs using SwingSet as a sanity check.
>>
>> I do not have any information on the performance difference (benefits
>> or otherwise)
>> of this change but I did not see any usage in java.desktop that
>> appears to be
>> remotely performance critical.
>>
>> -phil.
>>
>


-- 
Best regards, Sergey.



More information about the 2d-dev mailing list