[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Review request for JDK-8147413 : api/java_awt/Image/MultiResolutionImage/index.html\#MultiResolutionRenderingHints[test_VALUE_RESOLUTION_VARIANT_BASE] started to fail
Phil Race
philip.race at oracle.com
Wed Jan 20 20:57:40 UTC 2016
It seems like the expectation was that BASE could be drawn by the old
imaging path.
which would be lower overhead.
I think we should ask Alexandr what the intention was here and whether the
code that handles the base image needs to be taught how to extract data from
a MultiResolutionImage.
-phil.
On 01/20/2016 08:20 AM, Jayathirth D V wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> __
>
> _Please review the following fix in JDK9:_
>
> Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147413
>
> Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jdv/8147413/webrev.00/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejdv/8147413/webrev.00/>
>
> Issue : JCK testcase
> api/java_awt/Image/MultiResolutionImage/index.html\#MultiResolutionRenderingHints[test_VALUE_RESOLUTION_VARIANT_BASE]
> is failing from b96 JDK9 build.
>
> Root cause : In getManager API of SurfaceManager.java we are trying to
> typecast BaseMultiResolutionImage to BufferedImage and it is causing
> ClassCastException and in turn IllegalArgumentException seen in result
> of test case. It is happening because of change made in JDK-8073320
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073320> in
> SunGraphics2D.java. In case of VALUE_RESOLUTION_VARIANT_BASE type we
> are not trying to convert MultiResolutionImage to BufferedImage.
>
> Solution : Modify the condition present in drawHiDPIImage API to
> convert all MultiResolutionImage to BufferedImage irrespective of
> KEY_RESOLUTION_VARIANT type.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jay
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/attachments/20160120/0f9c58e8/attachment.html>
More information about the 2d-dev
mailing list