[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9]: RFR JDK-8147077, , IllegalArgumentException thrown by api/java_awt/Component/FlipBufferStrategy/indexTGF_General
Jim Graham
james.graham at oracle.com
Mon Jan 25 21:16:13 UTC 2016
That's fine...
...jim
On 1/24/2016 9:26 PM, prasanta sadhukhan wrote:
> Thanks Jim for review. Since this a JCK bug on linux, I would like to
> push this fix.
> I will test on other platforms and pipeline and if any issue found
> similar, I will create separate bug and fix on that id. Will that be ok?
>
> Regards
> Prasanta
> On 1/23/2016 4:34 AM, Jim Graham wrote:
>> That looks good. While we are at it, do any of the other platforms or
>> pipelines need the same fix applied?
>>
>> ...jim
>>
>> On 1/22/2016 4:01 AM, prasanta sadhukhan wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Please review a JCK regression fix for JDK-8140530
>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140530>
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147077
>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8147077/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> JDK-8140530 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140530> was fixed
>>> to maintain consistency across platforms
>>> so that VolatileImage of 0 width,height should result in IAE in linux as
>>> it was already causing IAE in windows.
>>> Also, non-volatile Image via
>>> GraphicsConfiguration.createCompatibleImage(0,0) or a
>>> BufferedImage(0,0,imagetype) also was resulting in IAE.
>>>
>>> But it was found that api/java_awt/Component/FlipBufferStrategy JCK test
>>> was causing X11GraphicsConfig.createBackBuffer to create (0,0)
>>> volatileimage
>>> resulting in IAE in linux. The same test was passing in windows as it
>>> was found that D3DGraphicsConfig#createbackBuffer does not create 0
>>> sized VolatileImage rather
>>> it resize to (1,1) if it finds a 0 sized VolatileImage is requested.
>>> The same fix is applied to X11GraphicsConfig too to make sure back
>>> buffer is created with at least (1,1) volatileimage.
>>>
>>> The issue is marked noreg-jck so no regression test is added.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Prasanta
>
More information about the 2d-dev
mailing list