[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Review Request for JDK-8160943 : [PIT] new failure of closed/javax/imageio/ReadAllThumbnailsTest.java
Jayathirth D V
jayathirth.d.v at oracle.com
Tue Jul 12 16:15:33 UTC 2016
Hi,
Thanks for your input Phil.
I have made changes just to parse "FF FF"(Like "FF 00" or any marker without length)and not consider it as an invalid marker in skipImage() of JPEGImageReader.java.
Also I have removed closed/javax/imageio/ReadAllThumbnailsTest.java from ProblemList.txt as part of fix.
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160943
Please find webrev for review for JDK9:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jdv/8160943/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Jay
From: Phil Race
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2016 12:37 AM
To: Jayathirth D V
Cc: Jim Graham; 2d-dev
Subject: Re: REG : JDK-8160943 : [PIT] new failure of closed/javax/imageio/ReadAllThumbnailsTest.java
On 07/08/2016 04:08 AM, Jayathirth D V wrote:
Hi,
In HYPERLINK "https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152672"JDK-8152672 we modified skipImage() in JpegImageReader.java and added tighter checks for parsing Jpeg data.
We have to find any marker,0 or EOF after we find "FF" while parsing JPEG data.
But in HYPERLINK "https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160943"JDK-8160943 we have gap between APP0 marker and DQT(FF DB) marker which contains data "00 FF".
APP0_End -> 00 FF -> FF DB(DQT)
So after we skip APP0 marker we find two bytes of data which is "FF FF". In the present code we consider this as invalid marker.
See https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf
B.1.1.2 Markers
Markers serve to identify the various structural parts of the compressed data formats.
Most markers start marker segments containing a related group of parameters;
some markers stand alone. All markers are assigned two-byte codes: an
X'FF' byte followed by a byte which is not equal to 0 or X'FF' (see Table B.1).
Any marker may optionally be preceded by any number of fill bytes,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
which are bytes assigned code X'FF
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-phil.
Because of this HYPERLINK "https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160943"JDK-8160943 is failing.
Is the length of APP0 marker not valid in the image or we should not consider "FF FF" as invalid maker?
Please let me know your input.
Thanks,
Jay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/attachments/20160712/74a78146/attachment.html>
More information about the 2d-dev
mailing list