[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Review Request for JDK-7107905: ColorModel subclasses are missing hashCode() or equals() or both methods

Jim Graham james.graham at oracle.com
Fri May 27 08:47:46 UTC 2016


Hi Jay,

.equals() should not be comparing any fields that are computed from 
other fields - generally fields that come directly from a constructor 
argument tend to be the fields to compare.  Internal state variables 
(such as "isInited" and the like) should never be compared.  It should 
be comparing fields that affect the interpretation of the color.  To 
that end...

In CM, add comparison/hash of:
    ColorSpace
    transferType

In CCM, do not compare or hash:
    needScaleInit (internal state for lazy ScaleInit)
    noUnnorm (computed from other constructor arguments)
    nonStdScale (computed from other constructor arguments)
    signed (computed from other constructor arguments)
    transferType (tested in CM)
(basically, CCM doesn't have anything to compares as all of its 
significant values are compared in the super class)

			...jim

On 05/27/2016 01:02 AM, Jayathirth D V wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gentle reminder.
> Please review updated fix:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jdv/7107905/webrev.07/
>
> Thanks,
> Jay
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jayathirth D V
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:43 PM
> To: Philip Race; Jim Graham
> Cc: 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Review Request for JDK-7107905: ColorModel subclasses are missing hashCode() or equals() or both methods
>
> Hi,
>
> Previously for this bug we were making changes related only to IndexColorModel. Since we are expanding to include hashCode() or equals() method from PackedColorModel and ComponentColorModel, I have created single webrev for review under the same bug id.
>
> Now the "getclass()==" check is present in base class ColorModel and each subclass of ColorModel have their own equality check for properties.
>
> Details:
> Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7107905
> Updated Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jdv/7107905/webrev.07/
>
> Please review the changes at your convenience.
>
> Thanks,
> Jay
>



More information about the 2d-dev mailing list