[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] Review request for 8167102: [macosx] PrintRequestAttributeSet breaks page size set using PageFormat
Anton Litvinov
anton.litvinov at oracle.com
Thu Mar 30 18:32:16 UTC 2017
Hello Phil,
Thank you very much for review of this fix. The new or the 3rd version
of the fix, in which I tried to address your remarks, is created and is
available at the next URL. The changes introduced into the fix are
summarized in the end of the e-mail. Could you please review the new
version of the fix.
Webrev (the 3rd version):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alitvinov/8167102/jdk9/webrev.02
In the second version of the fix I decided not to show the print dialog
just to reduce the number of manual actions. Today I have practically
verified that usage of either native or cross-platform dialogs does not
influence the test behavior anyhow, the document is printed with a
wrong paper size without the fix, and with the expected paper size with
the fix applied.
The user who reported the bug used "4 x 6 in" paper size, but in the
regression test I decided to use A5 paper size, because it is standard
and most importantly it is small, what lets to easily distinguish it
from, for example, A4 or "Letter" paper sizes usually used as default on
printers. But, yes, sure, the bug is not specific to A5, and to observe
it is necessary just to have a printer's default paper size be different
from a paper size in "PageFormat" set through
"PrinterJob.setPrintable(Printable, PageFormat)".
I decided to mark the test, as requiring only Mac platform, because the
issue occurs only on OS X platform and to reduce the number of manual
tests for other platforms.
Yes, sure, I verified practically and can confirm that with the applied
fix, if all or some of the attributes "OrientationRequested",
"MediaSizeName", "MediaPrintableArea" are specified in
"PrintRequestAttributeSet" transferred to
"PrinterJob.print(PrintRequestAttributeSet)" method, then the new
"PageFormat" based on values of these attributes is still created and
successfully applied to the printed page. This functionality is not
changed because, the new page format is created in the method
"RasterPrinterJob.setAttributes(PrintRequestAttributeSet)" in the "if"
block specified below
"if ((orientReq != null || media != null || mpa != null) &&
getPageable() instanceof OpenBook) {"
and saved in the PrinterJob in the end of this "if" block by the
expression "setPrintable(printable, pf);". The sequence of calls is
following:
CPrinterJob.print(PrintRequestAttributeSet) -->
CPrinterJob.setAttributes(PrintRequestAttributeSet) -->
RasterPrinterJob.setAttributes(PrintRequestAttributeSet)
CHANGES IN THE 3RD VERSION OF THE FIX:
In this version of the fix only the regression test was changed.
1) The jtreg argument "27 @requires (os.family == "mac")" was removed
and I verified that the test works and does not fail on Windows OS and
Linux OS.
2) Showing of the native print dialog is added to the test. "102
if (job.printDialog()) {"
3) The next "if" block is completely removed, because the condition will
never be fulfilled.
94 if (isoA5Size == null) {
95 throw new RuntimeException(
96 "No 'MediaSize' was found for
'MediaSizeName.ISO_A5'.");
97 }
4) The test timeout "60 private static final int testTimeout =
300000;" is increased from previous 3 minutes to 5 minutes.
5) The hard coded instruction for execution of the test was changed to
better reflect the test.
Thank you,
Anton
On 3/29/2017 8:34 PM, Philip Race wrote:
> If the test is manual anyway, why does it not display a dialog so it
> is easier
> to run. On mac you can always then save as PDF so the "virtual
> printer" isn't needed.
> Note: this assumes you are using the native dialog not the Swing one.
> Does this in some way change the test so that it passed anyway ?
>
>
> I also think you should try to verify this with
> (a) after displaying the cross-platform dialogs.
> (b) after displaying the native dialogs.
>
> There are an amazing number of code paths here ..
>
> throw new RuntimeException(
> "No 'MediaSize' was found for 'MediaSizeName.ISO_A5'.");
> Why insist on A5 ? Any number of sizes should work ?
> And making the test fail in such a case is plain wrong.
>
> Why @requires (os.family == "mac")
> since the test can run everywhere ? And it should pass everywhere too.
> This should be fixed.
>
> The directory name in the test is gratuitous and unneeded and
> the test name itself is ridiculously long.
> Instead let's call it
>
> Regarding the fix itself I am unclear what the impact is in
> the case the app supplies an attribute set that *does* have one or
> more attributes that affect PageFormat. It might well be that
> these are applied already but I'd like assurance that has been verified.
> Some of the code references below seem to be a bit munged by mail
> so I can't work out what is being said.
>
> -phil.
>
>
>
> On 3/28/17, 5:55 AM, Anton Litvinov wrote:
>> Hello Prasanta,
>>
>> The correct "PageFormat" for each separate page is retrieved in the
>> native function "PrinterView.m::rectForPage:(NSInteger)" by invoking
>> the Java method "CPrinterJob.getPageformatPrintablePeekgraphics(int)"
>> with the first expression specified below and getting the value of
>> "PageFormat" from the returned array with the second expression
>> specified below.
>>
>> "jobjectArray objectArray = JNFCallObjectMethod(env, fPrinterJob,
>> jm_getPageformatPrintablePeekgraphics, jPageNumber); // AWT_THREADING
>> Safe (AWTRunLoopMode)"
>> "jobject pageFormat = (*env)->GetObjectArrayElement(env, objectArray,
>> 0);"
>>
>> But in that native method "PrinterView.m::rectForPage" only the page
>> orientation field "mOrientation" of the retrieved "PageFormat" for
>> each page is analyzed and is set to "NSPrintInfo" object through
>> "NSPrintOperation". Thus for some reason at that method analysis of
>> the paper size is ignored.
>>
>> So obviously not taking into account individual paper size of the
>> pages for the case, which you described, when the user's code
>> specifies different "PageFormat" instances for different pages of the
>> document, should take place in JDK, though I did not verify this
>> practically. But this issue existed before my fix and is not a result
>> of the fix.
>>
>> I do not see anything bad in the hard coded "0" page number used in
>> my fix, because we need to initialize "NSPrintInfo" with a valid page
>> size and the page size of the first page of the document is the only
>> correct or appropriate value for this moment, and because this
>> approach already exists in "RasterPrinterJob.java" as the next
>> expression.
>>
>> "PageFormat pf = (PageFormat)pageable.getPageFormat(0).clone();"
>>
>> From my point of view, the issue about disrespect of different paper
>> sizes for different pages of the document is the issue which is
>> different from the issue described in this bug (JDK-8167102) and
>> should be fixed separately from my bug, because:
>> - In my bug "java.awt.print.Printable" interface is involved, while
>> in this new issue "java.awt.print.Pageable" interface is the explicit
>> requirement;
>> - In my bug calling "PrinterJob.print(PrintRequestAttributeSet)" with
>> a non-empty "PrintRequestAttributeSet" is the obligatory and the key
>> requirement, while in the new issue this condition is irrelevant.
>> - For my bug one regression test is necessary, while for the new
>> issue the different regression test is necessary.
>>
>> Therefore I suggest to file a separate bug for the discovered issue
>> and to address it separately from this bug (JDK-8167102). Would you
>> agree with this suggestion? Would you approve the second version of
>> the fix for the bug JDK-8167102?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Anton
>>
>> On 3/28/2017 12:46 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Anton,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/27/2017 10:05 PM, Anton Litvinov wrote:
>>>> Hello Prasanta,
>>>>
>>>> Indeed it is Mac specific, as it was written in my previous e-mail,
>>>> I verified this fact on Windows OS and Linux OS by your request.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I am fully sure that, when the bug occurs, the paper size of
>>>> the printed page is wrong, as it is stated in the bug, and I am
>>>> fully sure that with the applied any of 2 versions of the created
>>>> fix, the paper size of the printed page becomes correct and as
>>>> expected. Otherwise, I would not send the fix for review. The
>>>> instruction, by following which the bug can be reproduced, is
>>>> written in "STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :" section of
>>>> the description of the bug in JBS. This bug is raised by the user,
>>>> who owns a support contract and requests for resolution of this
>>>> bug, this can be seen in proper comments of the bug record.
>>>>
>>>> The automated regression test is not possible for this bug, since
>>>> it is necessary to verify visually that the document is physically
>>>> printed on the paper of the expected size. Otherwise, I would send
>>>> the 1st version of the fix with the automated test already, it is
>>>> not the first bug in JDK on which I have been working. By your
>>>> request the regression test, even though it is manual, was created
>>>> and added to the 2nd version of the fix.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it is correct, the implemented by the test, and the test case
>>>> method "Printable.print(Graphics, PageFormat, int)" receives the
>>>> correct instance of "PageFormat" in runtime in scenario described
>>>> in this bug, because, as you already described, it is extracted
>>>> using the expression "pageable.getPageFormat(pageIndex)" in the
>>>> Java method
>>>> "sun.lwawt.macosx.CPrinterJob.getPageformatPrintablePeekgraphics(int)"
>>>> called from "PrinterView.m::rectForPage:(NSInteger)" and further
>>>> transferred in this method to the Java method
>>>> "sun.lwawt.macosx.CPrinterJob.printAndGetPageFormatArea".
>>>>
>>>> The wrong paper size which is returned from the method
>>>> "RasterPrinterJob.getPageFormatFromAttributes()" and which is set
>>>> to certain fields of the Objective-C object "NSPrintInfo" in the
>>>> function "CPrinterJob.m::javaPaperToNSPrintInfo" through the next
>>>> call sequence
>>>>
>>>> CPrinterJob.m::printLoop() -->
>>>> CPrinterJob.m::javaPrinterJobToNSPrintInfo() -->
>>>> CPrinterJob.m::javaPageFormatToNSPrintInfo() -->
>>>> CPrinterJob.m::javaPaperToNSPrintInfo()
>>>>
>>>> further influences physical size of all pages printed by 1 printer job.
>>>>
>>>> Thus, I consider that firstly "PageFormat" returned from
>>>> "RasterPrinterJob.getPageFormatFromAttributes()" is wrong, and
>>>> secondly setting paper size from this wrong "PageFormat" to proper
>>>> fields of "NSPrintInfo" object is also incorrect and is a root
>>>> cause of this bug.
>>> OK. So, pageformat values set to native NSPrintInfo is different
>>> (wrong) compared to what is being passed to user.
>>>>
>>>> Implementation of Java Print Server API surely contains many
>>>> issues, and only working on this bug I already encountered 2
>>>> additional different issues, which are described in one of my
>>>> comments in this bug record in JBS. However, I prefer to resolve
>>>> issues separately and to resolve this particular bug also
>>>> separately from other issues which we can indefinitely find while
>>>> looking at the code and debugging it, also because it is necessary
>>>> to deliver the fix for this bug to "jdk8u-dev" repository finally,
>>>> while JDK 9 is currently in RDP 2 phase at which large fixes
>>>> affecting more platforms or large code scope would hardly be
>>>> accepted by Group and Area leads or the release team.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to bring also your attention again to the fact, which
>>>> was mentioned in my previous e-mail, that I already ran all manual
>>>> and automatic "jtreg" regression tests related to printing from
>>>> open and closed parts of JDK on JDK 9 without the fix and with the
>>>> fix, what is 198 tests.
>>>>
>>>> Do you find anything incorrect in the 2nd version of the fix? Will
>>>> you approve the 2nd version of the fix?
>>>>
>>> I think there might be a (probable) issue with this fix. PageFormat
>>> of 1st page only is used to get the information.
>>> jobject page = JNFCallObjectMethod(env, srcPrinterJob,
>>> jm_getPageFormat, (jint)0);
>>> What if user has set different pageformat to different page like
>>> this below? Will it not lose the 2nd page pageformat? I guess in
>>> windows/linux, we obtain pageformat for each pageindex
>>>
>>> PrinterJob job = PrinterJob.getPrinterJob();
>>> // Create a landscape pageformat
>>> PageFormat pfl = job.defaultPage();
>>> pfl.setOrientation(PageFormat.LANDSCAPE);
>>> //Setup a book
>>> Book bk = new Book();
>>> bk.append(new xPrintable(), pfl); // 1st page landscape , can be
>>> diff. pagesize too
>>> bk.append(new xxPrintable(), job.defaultPage()); //2nd page portrait
>>> job.setPageable(bk);
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Prasanta
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Anton
>>>>
>>>> On 3/27/2017 9:52 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Anton,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok. So, it seems it mac specific. But, are you sure wrong page
>>>>> size is used in mac as is claimed in the bug?
>>>>> I thought we could use automated regression test instead of manual
>>>>> by checking pageformat value in print() as compared to what user
>>>>> passes in setPrintable().
>>>>>
>>>>> Then, I see in print() method in testcase, the "PageFormat"
>>>>> argument passed has same values as it is passed in setPrintable()
>>>>> in main() even without your fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I reverse trace from print() method present in testcase, I see
>>>>> it is called from CPrinterJob.java#printAndGetPageFormatArea()
>>>>> which is called from PrinterView.m#rectForPage. And before calling
>>>>> printAndGetPageFormatArea() it calls
>>>>> getPageformatPrintablePeekgraphics() which calls
>>>>> pageable.getPageFormat(pageIndex), so it should behave same as
>>>>> windows. Am I missing something?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Prasanta
>>>>> On 3/27/2017 3:32 AM, Anton Litvinov wrote:
>>>>>> Hello Prasanta,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I verified that the bug is not reproducible using JDK 9 compiled
>>>>>> from the latest version of "jdk9/client" forest neither on
>>>>>> Windows, nor on Linux platform, therefore, yes, this bug is only
>>>>>> Mac specific. Debugging showed that on Windows platform the
>>>>>> behavior is exactly like you described, on Windows
>>>>>> "RasterPrinterJob.print(PrintRequestAttributeSet)" method is
>>>>>> responsible for printing the documents and in this method
>>>>>> "RasterPrinterJob.printPage(Pageable, int)" is called for each
>>>>>> page separately, and in this "printPage" method "PageFormat"
>>>>>> instance used for printing of the page is extracted from the the
>>>>>> transferred as the method argument instance of "Pageable" by the
>>>>>> expression "origPage = document.getPageFormat(pageIndex);".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The new version of the fix was created. Could you please review
>>>>>> the second version of the fix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Webrev (the 2nd version):
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alitvinov/8167102/jdk9/webrev.01
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the second version of the fix:
>>>>>> 1. Calling for "RasterPrinterJob.getPageFormatFromAttributes()"
>>>>>> was substituted for
>>>>>> "sun.lwawt.macosx.CPrinterJob.getPageFormat(int)" in the native
>>>>>> method "CPrinterJob.m#javaPrinterJobToNSPrintInfo".
>>>>>> 2. The method "RasterPrinterJob.getPageFormatFromAttributes()"
>>>>>> was removed, since it is not called from any other code in "jdk"
>>>>>> repository.
>>>>>> 3. The manual regression test was created.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also on OS X I executed all manual and automatic "jtreg"
>>>>>> regression tests related to printing from the listed below
>>>>>> directories and the corresponding directories in the closed
>>>>>> repositories using both JDK 9 compiled without and with the fix,
>>>>>> and I verified that no new test failed on JDK 9 with the fix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The directories with the regression tests from open repositories:
>>>>>> - "jdk/test/java/awt/print"
>>>>>> - "jdk/test/javax/print"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Anton
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/22/2017 7:42 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Anton,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thought about your point and have a question: does this issue
>>>>>>> not reproduce in non-mac platform?
>>>>>>> I thought it probably would so suggested modifying
>>>>>>> setAttributes() . But, if it is only reproduced in mac, we need
>>>>>>> to find out why despite this setAttributes() flaw, how this is
>>>>>>> working in non-mac platform?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It probably might work in windows/linux because in
>>>>>>> RasterPrinterJob.print(attr) method, after it calls
>>>>>>> setAttributes(), it calls printPage() where it gets the original
>>>>>>> PageFormat
>>>>>>> by calling getPageFormat(pageIndex) and gets the orientation,
>>>>>>> imageablearea
>>>>>>> and not by constructing pageFormat from attributes as it is done
>>>>>>> in mac.
>>>>>>> So, probably, in mac also, we need to do away with
>>>>>>> getPageFormatFromAttributes() call and call
>>>>>>> getPageFormat(pageIndex) from
>>>>>>> CPrinterJob.m#javaPrinterJobToNSPrintInfo().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Prasanta
>>>>>>> On 3/21/2017 8:15 PM, Anton Litvinov wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello Prasanta,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you for review of this fix. I have tried to apply the
>>>>>>>> approach which you suggested and it allowed to resolve the
>>>>>>>> issue. In this case I agree that it would be more correct to
>>>>>>>> resolve the issue in
>>>>>>>> "RasterPrinterJob.setAttributes(PrintRequestAttributeSet)"
>>>>>>>> method. In the first version of the fix I decided to change the
>>>>>>>> method "RasterPrinterJob.getPageFormatFromAttributes()",
>>>>>>>> because it is invoked only from 1 place in JDK code and this
>>>>>>>> place is located in OS X specific code
>>>>>>>> "jdk/src/java.desktop/macosx/native/libawt_lwawt/awt/CPrinterJob.m",
>>>>>>>> so that would automatically minimize the affected by the fix
>>>>>>>> platforms to OS X only.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Starting to work on implementation of the second version of the
>>>>>>>> fix including the regression test.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>> Anton
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2017 12:52 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think the real problem is not in
>>>>>>>>> RasterPrinterJob.getPageFormatFromAttributes().
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One can see that, when we call
>>>>>>>>> RasterPrinterJob.setPrintable(), we call
>>>>>>>>> updatePageAttributes() which in turn calls
>>>>>>>>> updateAttributesWithPageFormat() where orientation, media and
>>>>>>>>> mediaprintablearea "attributes" get populated/cached from the
>>>>>>>>> "pageformat" supplied by the user.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But, when PrinterJob.print(PrintRequestAttributeSet) is
>>>>>>>>> called, it calls setAttributes(attributes) where "attributes"
>>>>>>>>> is what is populated by the user. It does not contain
>>>>>>>>> orientation,media and mediaprintablearea attributes for this
>>>>>>>>> bug, so setAttributes sets cached attribute with this user-set
>>>>>>>>> attribute instance
>>>>>>>>> />>else {//
>>>>>>>>> //>> // for AWT where pageable is not an instance
>>>>>>>>> of OpenBook,//
>>>>>>>>> //>> // we need to save paper info//
>>>>>>>>> // >> this.attributes = attributes;//
>>>>>>>>> // >> }//
>>>>>>>>> /
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> //thereby losing the attributes it has cached earlier from
>>>>>>>>> user pageformat. I think we should check if this.attributes is
>>>>>>>>> not null, then retain those attributes unless explicitly set
>>>>>>>>> by the user in user-defined attributes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But, this code is used by windows,linux,mac so it needs to be
>>>>>>>>> tested against all those platforms to ensure we are not
>>>>>>>>> regressing anything.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, I think user should call validatePage(PageFormat) in
>>>>>>>>> application to check if the settings passed is compatible with
>>>>>>>>> the printer or not, get compatible/adjusted pageformat and
>>>>>>>>> call setPrintable() with that "adjusted" pageformat. If user
>>>>>>>>> pass 0,0,fullpaperwidth,fullpaperheight as imageablearea, then
>>>>>>>>> he should not expect this setting to be used since printer
>>>>>>>>> will have its own hardware limitation (and use some offset
>>>>>>>>> printing)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW, a regression testcase (even if it is manual) should be
>>>>>>>>> created with the fix.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Prasanta
>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2017 10:59 PM, Anton Litvinov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Could you please review the following fix for the bug.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167102
>>>>>>>>>> Webrev:
>>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alitvinov/8167102/jdk9/webrev.00
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The bug consists in the fact that, if the user's application
>>>>>>>>>> specifies the required page size (media size) through
>>>>>>>>>> "java.awt.print.PrinterJob" API particularly via
>>>>>>>>>> "java.awt.print.PageFormat" instance supplied to the method
>>>>>>>>>> "PrinterJob.setPrintable(Printable, PageFormat)" and calls
>>>>>>>>>> "PrinterJob.print(PrintRequestAttributeSet)" with
>>>>>>>>>> "javax.print.attribute.PrintRequestAttributeSet" containing
>>>>>>>>>> at least 1 any "PrintRequestAttribute", then the page or
>>>>>>>>>> pages will be printed with "PageFormat" describing the
>>>>>>>>>> default page size of the printer which is different from the
>>>>>>>>>> expected and originally set by the user's application
>>>>>>>>>> "PageFormat".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Debugging showed that the new "PageFormat" with unexpected
>>>>>>>>>> media size is created in the method
>>>>>>>>>> "sun.print.RasterPrinterJob.getPageFormatFromAttributes()"
>>>>>>>>>> which is invoked from the native function
>>>>>>>>>> "jdk/src/java.desktop/macosx/native/libawt_lwawt/awt/CPrinterJob.m::javaPrinterJobToNSPrintInfo".
>>>>>>>>>> The method "RasterPrinterJob.getPageFormatFromAttributes()"
>>>>>>>>>> returns a new "PageFormat" always, if the provided by the
>>>>>>>>>> user "PrintRequestAttributeSet" is not empty, and the default
>>>>>>>>>> values are set to particular instance variables of this
>>>>>>>>>> "PageFormat", if "PrintRequestAttributeSet" does not contain
>>>>>>>>>> the searched "OrientationRequested", "MediaSizeName",
>>>>>>>>>> "MediaPrintableArea" attributes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> THE SOLUTION:
>>>>>>>>>> Although it is clearly stated in Java Platform SE 8 API
>>>>>>>>>> Specification (documentation of the method
>>>>>>>>>> "PrinterJob.print(PrintRequestAttributeSet)")
>>>>>>>>>> Specification URL:
>>>>>>>>>> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/awt/print/PrinterJob.html#print-javax.print.attribute.PrintRequestAttributeSet-
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> that media size, orientation and imageable area attributes
>>>>>>>>>> specified in "PrintRequestAttributeSet" supplied to the
>>>>>>>>>> method "PrinterJob.print" will be used for construction of a
>>>>>>>>>> new "PageFormat", which will be passed to "Printable" object,
>>>>>>>>>> instead of the original "PageFormat" instance set through
>>>>>>>>>> "PrinterJob.setPrintable" method, the observed in this issue
>>>>>>>>>> behavior is a bug, because in the bug test case neither media
>>>>>>>>>> size, nor orientation, nor imageable area attributes are
>>>>>>>>>> specified in "PrintRequestAttributeSet".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The fix alters the method
>>>>>>>>>> "sun.print.RasterPrinterJob.getPageFormatFromAttributes()" to
>>>>>>>>>> use corresponding values from "PageFormat" instance
>>>>>>>>>> originally set through "PrinterJob" API during construction
>>>>>>>>>> of the new "PageFormat", when it is found out that
>>>>>>>>>> "OrientationRequested", or "MediaSizeName", or
>>>>>>>>>> "MediaPrintableArea" attribute is not specified in
>>>>>>>>>> "PrintRequestAttributeSet" supplied to "PrinterJob.print"
>>>>>>>>>> method.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>> Anton
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/attachments/20170330/6bb5cf75/attachment.html>
More information about the 2d-dev
mailing list