[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR JDK-8184429: Path clipper added in Marlin2D & MarlinFX 0.8.0

[Phil Race]

I think they should be separate webrevs sent to the separate lists and 
you should start with 2D
as I can then run the JDK regression tests on it. I know you can 
theoretically run the open regression
tests too (are you ?) but there are some random scattered closed 
regression tests that so far
as I can see can be open sourced .. that I can run but you can't .. I'll 
at least run the
automated ones. I wouldn't call them anything very focused on testing 
rasterization but
I can at least check off that concern ..

And yes, I'll make time to review it.

-phil.

On 11/08/2017 01:55 PM, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
> Kevin & Phil,
>
> Some news on that issue:
> I successfully managed to finish the Path clipping support in Marlin 
> 0.8.2 (release last week):
> https://github.com/bourgesl/marlin-renderer/releases/tag/v0.8.2
>
> I fixed few remaining bugs in either Stroker (1) and in PathClipFilter 
> (2) to have proper & tested clipping in Marlin renderer (2D). It now 
> works perfectly with either NZ or EO winding rules.
>
> To ensure detecting any artefact between Clipping Off vs On, I 
> implemented a 'basher' test (as recommended by Jim) that renderers 10 
> 000 random polygons (5 -> 9 -> 50 line segments or mixed with line / 
> quads / cubics) ( whose point coordinates are in [-50 to 150] ) to a 
> 100x100 buffered image with or without clipping enabled (using a 
> system property at runtime). Of course, all output pixels are compared 
> and any pixel difference is considered as a failure.
>
> The new ShapeClipTests tests all stroke combinations (cap / join / 
> with or without dashes / closed or not / EO or NZ rule) and also fills 
> (closed or not / EO or NZ rule) => 170 tests run OK
>
> I need some time to synchronize MarlinFX and then with either OpenJDK 
> forrest (new) or OpenJFX10.
> If you want the new automated test (long run ~ 20 minutes), I need 
> some time to refactor it as it uses some code from my MapBench tool 
> and have a standalone test class.
>
> Will you have time to review such (medium) changes in Marlin2D (Phil 
> ?) and / or MarlinFX (Kevin ?) before the deadline (dec 14th) ?
> I said 'medium' as the code is quite simple to read but the new CG 
> algorithms to ignore / discard useless path elements are cool but not 
> obvious.
>
> Please tell me if you have time and if you prefer a combined (JDK / 
> JFX) webrev or start with 2D or JFX.
>
> Cheers,
> Laurent
>
>
> 2017-09-07 8:52 GMT+02:00 Laurent Bourgès <bourges.laurent at gmail.com 
> <mailto:bourges.laurent at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi Kevin,
>
>     Ok I propose to withdraw or postpone this review after JavaOne
>     where we will be able to discuss in a face to face meeting about
>     Marlin & MarlinFX changes for JDK10.
>
>     I hope the 2d / jfx groups have other Graphics Guru to help, as
>     good as Jim Graham.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Laurent
>
>     Le 6 sept. 2017 16:23, "Kevin Rushforth"
>     <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>> a
>     écrit :
>
>         Hi Laurent,
>
>         Some combination of Phil, Sergey, and I will take a look at
>         this when we can. Perhaps there might be others on these two
>         lists who could lend a helping hand?
>
>         -- Kevin
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/attachments/20171108/2aff1cf0/attachment-0001.html>