[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFC: Fix for JDK-8188030

[Phil Race]

Yes, that would work .. ie preserve the status quo .. not needed in 10 
though, this would be 8-only.

Are you going to push the 10 version of the fix any time soon ?

-phil.

On 10/19/2017 01:59 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Philip Race <philip.race at oracle.com> wrote:
>> I think for  JDK 8 you can pass down a flag to decide whether to include or
>> exclude CFF.
>> This flag would be the value of FontUtilities.isOpenJDK() and that should
>> tell us what we need.
>> That would preserve the status quo for Oracle JDK and it would be our
>> problem if the same
>> bug were then reported against that release.
> Is something like that what you have in mind?
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/8188030/webrev-jdk8.01/
>
> Cheers,
> Mario