[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR [XS] : 8233202: exclude javax/swing/plaf/basic/BasicGraphicsUtils/8132119/bug8132119.java

[Philip Race]

Theoretically we've been going to fix this fragile test for weeks.

It tests something important or else I'd ditch it completely ..

Prasanta  ?

-phil.

On 10/30/19, 7:14 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> looks good, I definitely second that. Let's wait what 2d folks (Phil?) 
> have to say.
>
> Best regards
>
> Christoph
>
> *From:* Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com>
> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 30. Oktober 2019 14:59
> *To:* 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net
> *Cc:* Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> *Subject:* RFR [XS] : 8233202: exclude 
> javax/swing/plaf/basic/BasicGraphicsUtils/8132119/bug8132119.java
>
> Please review the following small change .
>
> It excludes 
> javax/swing/plaf/basic/BasicGraphicsUtils/8132119/bug8132119.java  ; 
> the test  seems to  be  fragile on various Linux distros ,
>
>     for instance on our Ubuntu 18 .
>
> The issues are already described in detail  here :
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229935
>
> "All in all this test looks really fragile. It is a miracle it has 
> passed as much as it has .. I think Linux
> may expose this because the font being used is more or less "fixed" on 
> the other platforms but
> on Linux the font being used varies."
>
> As long as 8229935  is notfixed,  the test should be excluded at  
> least  on Linux  .
>
> Bug/webrev :
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233202
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8233202.0/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Embaesken/webrevs/8233202.0/>
>
> Thanks, Matthias
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/attachments/20191030/4c0381be/attachment-0001.html>