Question about non-integrated patches
Anton Kozlov
akozlov at azul.com
Tue Jul 5 18:01:11 UTC 2016
Hi,
Andrew, I'm very surprised to hear "just wrong", without arguments.
In that long discussion we've talked about NativeTrampolineCall, is there a
mistake here?
Let's continue technical discussion in that thread
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/2016-July/000364.html
Thanks,
Anton
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 16:08 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 21/06/16 15:12, Edward Nevill wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/2016-March/000183.
> > > html
> > There was a lengthy review with Andrew Haley which did not reach any
> > conclusion.
> NativeGeneralJump::replace_mt_safe() was just wrong. There's no
> safe way to do what that patch was trying to do, which is why we
> ended up using trampolines in AArch64.
>
> Andrew.
>
More information about the aarch32-port-dev
mailing list