[8u] RFR: 8151032: aarch32: restore changeset 7684
Sergey Nazarkin
snazarkin at azul.com
Fri Mar 4 09:13:01 UTC 2016
Hi Ed,
regarding 8151058 I just adopted JDK9 variant. However it doesn’t matter what macros is sued for ID definition.
WBR,
Sergey Nazarkin
> On 03 Mar 2016, at 19:38, Edward Nevill <edward.nevill at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 16:18 +0000, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
>> Hi Sergey,
>>
>> On 03/03/2016 02:56 PM, Sergey Nazarkin wrote:
>>> Thank you, Alex, for such detailed update. I’ve got only one note regarding https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8149667 (Remove dependency on the code specific to Oracle's closed ARM port): it is not approved yet and there is a very little chance to be committed soon.
>>
>> It looks like 8151058 depends on 8149667 as it uses AARCH32_ONLY macro
>> that was introduced in 8149667 -
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~snazarki/8149667/src/share/vm/utilities/macros.hpp.udiff.html
>>
>>>
>
> Hi Sergey, Alex,
>
> Yes, I have fixed that and will push it shortly. I am just doing a build
> and test.
>
> Regarding 8149667 I would like to sort this whole mess out. We have way
> too many ARM macros, ARM, ARM32, AARCH32, AARCH64, and I'm not sure what
> they all mean.
>
> However, if this is blocking you in any way at all I will just push it
> and we can review it later (thats what hg backout is for after all:-)
>
> BTW: I have reviewed all your recent patches and will push them shortly.
> If I have missed any please let me know.
>
> All the best,
> Ed.
>
>
More information about the aarch32-port-dev
mailing list