[RFR] jdk9.0.4+12 + functionality

[Andrey Petushkov]

Hi Ed,

That was http://hg.openjdk.java.net/aarch32-port/jdk9/
Indeed you're right but I have no idea why that has happened, I just pulled
from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk9u/ and merged. Both went
flawlessly. I'll redo the operation and check if the problem persists. (And
sorry, I just don't want to run webrev again, it took about 2 days to
complete!)

Thanks,
Andrey

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 11:42 PM Edward Nevill <edward.nevill at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Andrey,
>
> What repo are these changesets based on?
>
> I have tried
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/aarch32-port/jdk9/
>
> and
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/aarch32-port/jdk9-arm3264/
>
> But the changesets don't seem to apply cleanly.
>
> All the best,
> Ed.
>
> On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 17:42 +0300, Andrey Petushkov wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > There are the following changes proposed for review and commit into
> > aarch32-jdk9 repo set:
> > - update to the latest jdk9u state:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetushkov/aarch32jdk9.0.4%2b12/ <http://
> > cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetushkov/aarch32jdk9.0.4+12/>
> > (2Gbyte webrev, not something you really want to look into)
> > - bring all functionality developed by Azul in course of jdk8
> > projects
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetushkov/aarch32jdk9-azul/ <http://cr.o
> > penjdk.java.net/~apetushkov/aarch32jdk9-azul/>
> > almost everything is already part of aarch32-jdk8u repo, although
> > we’ve been lagging behind with a few features (primarily c2 and
> > crypto intrinsics). We’re apologising for that. And, again, sorry for
> > brining this in a typical manner of 10K line patch. The reason is
> > that we were not following regular jdk9 development and only recently
> > brought out code in line with java 9. So there was no set of
> > meaningful changes even internally to Azul but rather something close
> > to what you can see at the link above
> >
>