RFR 8191985: Tlab refills for ARM
Dmitry Samersov
dmitry.samersoff at bell-sw.com
Tue Jan 9 10:52:29 UTC 2018
Edward,
On 05.01.2018 14:13, Edward Nevill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can this change be pushed to jdk/hs now?
> Have we got a formal Reviewer?
The fix looks good to me.
> I can push it if required.
Let me know if you need a help to push the fix.
-Dmitry
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8191985/webrev.02/
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191985
>
> All the best,
> Ed.
>
> On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 09:19 -0800, JC Beyler wrote:
>> Perfect, thanks Edward for testing :)
>> Jc
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Edward Nevill <edward.nevill at gmail.
>> com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have built and tested this on a Samsung Chromebook (armv7l).
>>>
>>> The tests I ran were jtreg hotspot tests patched vs original in
>>> three configurations, default gc (g1gc), parallelgc and serialgc.
>>> The results in all cases were identical before and after patching.
>>>
>>> Default gc (g1gc): passed: 1,435; failed: 9; error: 116
>>> ParallelGC: passed: 1,331; failed: 8; error: 112
>>> SerialGC: passed: 1,326; failed: 7; error: 112
>>>
>>> Patch looks good to me.
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Ed.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 09:06 -0800, JC Beyler wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for taking a look at the webrev!
>>>>
>>>> Here is the change relative to jdk/hs:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8191985/webrev.02/
>>>>
>>>> Let me know what you think, hopefully I didn't make a mistake
>>>> when
>>>> making the webrev :)
>>>> Jc
>>>>
>>>>
More information about the aarch32-port-dev
mailing list