[aarch64-port-dev ] 8153107: Unbalanced recursive locking

[Andrey Petushkov]

Sure,  me too

Thank you,
Andrey

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018, 22:53 White, Derek <Derek.White at cavium.com> wrote:

> Yes, It's a go for me on aarch64.
>
>  - Derek
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aarch64-port-dev [mailto:aarch64-port-dev-
> > bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Daniel D. Daugherty
> > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 2:34 PM
> > To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>; Andrey Petushkov
> > <andrey.petushkov at gmail.com>
> > Cc: aarch64-port-dev at openjdk.java.net; hotspot-runtime-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net; AArch32 Port Project <aarch32-port-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] 8153107: Unbalanced recursive locking
> >
> > External Email
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > OK so I'm not going to get a "go" based on reproducible test results.
> > I'm okay with that as long as I get a "go" from the other folks
> reviewing and
> > discussing this change:
> >
> > Andrew Haley     - go (as stated below)
> > Andrey Petushkov -
> > Dan Daugherty    - go (since Oracle platform testing passed)
> > Derek White      -
> >
> > Of course, I could have listed Andrey as a go since he is the author of
> the fix,
> > but I didn't want to assume... :-)
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > On 6/18/18 12:07 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > On 06/18/2018 05:02 PM, Andrey Petushkov wrote:
> > >> And as I said, I have a reproducer. It just happen that it only
> > >> reproduces the problem on port-aarch32 implementation
> > > Well, I'm sure that I can't reproduce the problem either, and I
> > > believe that the bug does not exist on AArch64.  I'm happy for your
> > > patch to be committed.
> > >
>
>