[RFR] jdk9.0.4+12 + functionality

[Andrey Petushkov]

Dear Ed,

Thank you so much. Not a problem at all, since I believe nobody would want to take this code anyway. However someone might want Java 10 aarch32 port and it’s almost ready. I’ve done the coding and now running tests (gtests are passed, hotspot jtreg is one the way). It’s based on my jdk9 patch and structured in similar way - as a single patch to be applied to the jdk10u clone. I’ll publish a webrev once the quality is confirmed as good. It would be nice if you request a jdk10u repo for the project ;)

Thank you,
Andrey

> On 30 May 2018, at 13:45, Edward Nevill <edward.nevill at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrey,
> 
> Sorry for the delay in replying. Busy!
> 
> I have requested ops to populate the aarch32 area with a clean copy of
> jdk9u from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk9u
> 
> I will try some test builds of your port.
> 
> All the best,
> Ed.
> 
> On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 13:36 +0300, Andrey Petushkov wrote:
>> Dear Ed,
>> 
>> I’ve reworked the webrevs to address the problems:
>> - the base is now jdk9-updates repo set. First set of patches brings
>> current aarch32-jdk9 project changes. The second adds compilers and
>> stuff. The patches apply cleanly for me
>> - —with-cpu-port flag is functional. (“arm” means cpu/arm, “aarch32”
>> or absent selects cpu/aarch32). I’ve successfully build all 4 arm
>> ports. (I’ve unified selection of Oracle’s port under “arm” flag
>> value for both 32 and 64-bit versions, contrary to existing “arm64"
>> value. Please let me know if you consider it’s inappropriate)
>> - copyrights are in the same style as everybody’s else. copyrights
>> removed for the files which do not carry functional changes
>>