[RFR] jdk9.0.4+12 + functionality
Andrey Petushkov
andrey.petushkov at gmail.com
Wed May 30 13:52:58 UTC 2018
Oh, yes. That’s right. top.hpp was removed in the shared code. Unfortunately there are many more changes in the shared code which prevent current aarch32-jdk9 from compiling :( Frankly I did not consider fixing that since anyway that would require to redo a lot of work which is already in http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetushkov/aarch32-jdk9-try2/azul-jdk9/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetushkov/aarch32-jdk9-try2/azul-jdk9/>
Would it be ok if you just check the final state?
Andrey
> On 30 May 2018, at 15:38, Edward Nevill <edward.nevill at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK. Thanks. My misunderstanding.
>
> But there still seem to be files missing. I now get
>
> /work/ed/openjdk/jdk9u-aarch32/hotspot/src/cpu/aarch32/vm/frame_aarch32.hpp:31:29: fatal error: utilities/top.hpp: No such file or directory
> #include "utilities/top.hpp"
>
> And indeed there is no top.hpp in the patched source, but there is in aarch32/jdk9.
>
> Build command was
>
> bash ./configure --with-jobs=2 --disable-warnings-as-errors --with-boot-jdk=/work/ed/images/jdk9u --with-jvm-variants=core
> make images
>
> Regards,
> Ed.
>
>
> On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 14:49 +0300, Andrey Petushkov wrote:
>> That is because http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetushkov/aarch32-jdk9-t
>> ry2/jdk9.0.4%2b12 only brings those code which initially was in
>> aarch32-jdk9 repos. And there were no c1 there, hence you only can
>> build variant=core, not client. You should be able to have all 3 once
>> you as well apply http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetushkov/aarch32-jdk9
>> -try2/azul-jdk9/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrey
>>
>>>
More information about the aarch32-port-dev
mailing list