[aarch64-port-dev ] Mixing of aarch64_c2 and default branch code

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Mon Aug 12 03:28:14 PDT 2013


On 08/12/2013 09:50 AM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> This doesn't actually matter as far as building the C1/C2 variants goes
> because the C2 code (in aarch64.ad or generated from it) does not get
> included in the build process unless you configure either a tiered or a
> C2 build. However, it does make it a little easier for me to make
> changes which break C1. I don't know whether it is worth continuing with
> a separate aarch64_c2 branch given that the code bases are now
> effectively merged. Anyone have any opinions on this?

Branches are a Bad Thing.  Merging them has been a continuing PITA.

Andrew.




More information about the aarch64-port-dev mailing list