[aarch64-port-dev ] Whether or not to revert of checkcast_arraycopy stub to generate return value expected by generic C2 code

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Tue Oct 15 08:32:20 PDT 2013


On 10/15/2013 04:22 PM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> Hmm, yes but I did borrow the counting up from negative from the Intel
> code and also ended up adding code to the zero, success, fail cases that
> is merged in your original. Here's a proper rewrite based more closely
> on your code which avoids a lot of the redundancy in my original
> version. It really just adds the save of the original count and the
> compute of -1^K so the extra cost is minimal.

That looks right.

Andrew.




More information about the aarch64-port-dev mailing list