[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: Fix SEGV with volatile field accesses

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Thu Feb 20 05:03:09 PST 2014


On 02/20/2014 12:57 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Can't we imply nuke the patters that recognize instructions we can't
> generate?  Then C2 would have only patterns that take a volatile address
> with no offset.

Ahh, scratch that: we have to be able to match Address(reg, offset).
Close, but no cigar.  :-)

Andrew.



More information about the aarch64-port-dev mailing list