[aarch64-port-dev ] Freeze aarch64/jdk8
Edward Nevill
edward.nevill at gmail.com
Fri Apr 8 20:29:50 UTC 2016
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 11:37 +0000, Andrew Dinn wrote:
>
> On 25/02/16 10:25, Edward Nevill wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:11 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >> The jdk8 development tree at aarch64/jdk8 has been in use for some
> >> time. I don't think we need it any more. aarch64/jdk8u tracks
> >> upstream jdk8u far more closely: it differs from upstream only in the
> >> minimum number of places needed to get AArch64 to work.
> >
> > Perhaps to close out the jdk8 tree it might be good to backport the following patch
> >
> > http://openjdk.linaro.org/releases/1602/jdk8/patches/8592.patch
> >
> > This is a really nasty, critical bug and people are still building from this tree,
>
> I'm in the process of backporting all missing jdk8 hotspot patches into
> jdk8u. Unfortunately, one of the patches applied cleanly but made the
> changes in the wrong place (all those 0x1f and 0x3f substitutions for
> shifts were carefully misaligned by hg patch into the wrong cases). I
> have just started testing a newly patched build which corrects for this
> failure.
>
> regards,
Hi,
This patch still does not seem to have made it into jdk8u and is still
causing random SEGVs in specjbb.
May I backport it?
Thanks,
Ed.
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list