[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR(S): 8087341: C2 doesn't optimize redundant memory operations with G1
Roland Westrelin
roland.westrelin at oracle.com
Fri Feb 12 12:36:09 UTC 2016
Hi Andrew,
> A patch for the AArch64 C2 volatile/CAS generation code which deals with
> the effects of your proposed C2 patch is available as a webrev
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~adinn/8087341-aarch64/webrev.00/
Thanks for putting that together. I didn’t expect that simple change to cause so much trouble.
> n.b. I have /not/ created a separate issue for the AArch64 part of this
> fix. I am not sure whether you want to combine it with your patch or
> push it as a separate stage.
I can push everything together and list you as a contributor (in the contributed-by field) if that works for you.
Vladimir, can you take another look at this? Your two objections were:
> Also we have specialized insert_mem_bar_volatile() if we don't want wide memory affect. Why not use it?
The membar in the change takes the entire memory state as input but only changes raw memory. I don’t think that can be achieved with insert_mem_bar_volatile(). As explained by Mikael, the membar is here to force ordering between the oop store and the card table load. That’s why I think the membar’s inputs and outputs should be set up that way.
> And we need to keep precedent edge link to oop store in case EA eliminates related allocation.
Mikael said it’s not ok to eliminate the memory barrier if we leave the gc barrier.
Roland.
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list