[aarch64-port-dev ] aarch64 and arm64 jdk benchmarks result sharing

[Zhongwei Yao]

Hi, Bob,
There are specJBB2015 and Hadoop TeraSort in our benchmarks results
already. Please check the other tabs in our benchmarks result in the
spreadsheet. Thanks!

On 8 April 2017 at 03:37, Bob Vandette <bob.vandette at oracle.com> wrote:

> Zongwei,
>
> Thanks for running these benchmarks.
>
> Have you had the chance to try any server workload type of benchmarks?
>
> Just wondering if you had any results running things like specJBB or
> Hadoop TeraSort.
>
> Bob.
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 2017, at 9:43 PM, Zhongwei Yao <zhongwei.yao at linaro.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >  We have been running some Java benchmarks on AArch64 servers with
> different
> > OpenJDK ports: aarch64 and arm64. You can find the results at [1].
> >  And our JDK version:
> >       - aarch64 OpenJDK: build from latest JDK9 source with config:
> >        "--with-jvm-variants=server --with-debug-level=release"
> >
> >       - arm64 OpenJDK: build from latest JDK9 source with config:
> >        "--with-jvm-variants=server --with-debug-level=release --wi
> > th-cpu-port=arm64"
> >
> >  And from the data, aarch64 OpenJDK is better than arm64 OpenJDK
> > generally, but with some exceptions. So we think it is worth to take a
> look
> > at following cases for aarch64 OpenJDK:
> >        - Dacapo's sunflow, tradebeans and xalan
> >        - SPECjvm2008's scimark.lu.large
> >
> >  And we also find arm64 is better than aarch64 for byte/short data type
> > vectorization in our JMH cases ([2]), which we are investigating.
> >
> >  Feedbacks are welcome. Thanks!
> >
> >  [1]:
> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18iklOrbaL67i46XHsPTrdTObWqUJJ
> K8EO4-k0eqdLKM/edit?usp=sharing
> >  [2]: https://git.linaro.org/leg/openjdk/jmh-linaro-org.git/
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Zhongwei
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Zhongwei