[aarch64-port-dev ] [RFR] 8151841: Build needs additional flags to compile with GCC 6 [plus parts of 8149647 & 8032045]
Andrew Dinn
adinn at redhat.com
Thu Aug 31 09:04:49 UTC 2017
On 30/08/17 16:29, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I haven't merged to shenandoah/jdk8u yet as it doesn't seem worth it
> for just the one fix and there is nothing else in the aarch64/jdk8u repositories
> after aarch64-jdk8u144-b01. Are there any pending backports to aarch64/jdk8u
> which would then make a worthwhile batch of changes to merge over to
> the Shenandoah tree?
>
> Of course, in the worst case, it'll be merged with the next security update
> in October.
I don't know of any other changes that need merging. However, it would
be very helpful also to have this in shenandoah/jdk8u repo because it
ensures that anyone can build the repo on fedora, not just those who
know the necessary black magic. I'm particularly thinking of JBoss staff
like Andy Miller (who recently wanted to build and a Shenandoah
slowdebug JVM and then debug it using gdb). So, unless there is a good
reason not to merge just this one change could we please have it?
regards,
Andrew Dinn
-----------
Senior Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list