[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: JDK8u-only: Fix MacroAssembler::mov() over-strict assert
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Wed Dec 6 13:23:06 UTC 2017
On 06/12/17 13:19, Roman Kennke wrote:
> Am 06.12.2017 um 14:16 schrieb Andrew Haley:
>> On 06/12/17 12:46, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>> Am 05.12.2017 um 15:00 schrieb Andrew Dinn:
>>>> Hi Roman,
>>>>
>>>> On 05/12/17 12:31, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>> An alternative could be to keep the assert in place, but use a better
>>>>> dead value, e.g. badHeapOop from globalDefinitions.hpp . In this case I
>>>>> would bring 9 and 10 in sync too.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>> I think it is a good idea to keep the assert. So, badheapOop it is . . .
>>>
>>> Ok. That makes the fix simpler:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/aarch64-jdk8u-movoops/webrev.01/
>>>
>>> Ok? I'd push it into aarch64-port/jdk8u and let
>>> aarch64-port/jdk8u-shenandoah pick it up through regular merge-flow.
>>>
>>> Do you think it's worth to also put it upstream? We don't have this
>>> problem there because the assert is not present in upstream. I'd have to
>>> put back both the assert and the badHeapOop change. ?
>>
>> Please don't. I tidied this stuff up for 9, so it shouldn't be a
>> problem there.
>>
>
> It is not a problem in jdk9 and jdk10.
>
> So... I'll push it to aarch64-port/jdk8u only, is that ok?
The patch is fine, but I can see no bug report.
--
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list