[aarch64-port-dev ] Backport patches for 8031818, 8139758 and 8144993
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Mon Jun 19 12:41:48 UTC 2017
On 19/06/17 13:16, Felix Yang wrote:
> Actually, I am not quite clear about the correct procedure to do
> backport on jdk8u repo. Please let me know if there is anything wrong I am
> doing.
You just submit them to the -8u list.
> There are not bugfixing patches, but just performance
> improvement ones. So it seems to me that it might be hard or
> inappropriate for them to go into jdk8u repo, right?
In which case they're inappropriate in aarch64-jdk8u, too. I can
think of no reason why stability is less important to AArch64 than to
the other ports. Stability is a key component of software quality,
and I want AArch64 to be of a quality that is just as good as other
ports.
> As the jdk8u aarch64 port repo can benefit from these patches in
> respect of performance, I want this repo to have them.
> I don't want to keep them in my private repo, but this will
> surely cause some difference for shared code between jdk8u and jdk8u
> aarch64 port.
There shouldn't be any differences in shared code between jdk8u and
jdk8u aarch64 except for critical bugs. Performance patches could be
considered if the performance difference was severe and due to a bug,
but in that case they'd be considered for jdk8u as well.
--
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list