[aarch64-port-dev ] [OpenJDK8u] java.nio.Bits.unaligned() doesn't handle aarch64

Andrew Hughes gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Fri May 12 13:16:43 UTC 2017



----- Original Message -----
> On 12/05/17 08:17, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > It seems that some have now been accepted and some rejected, though
> > with no explanation as to the reasoning behind either. Fortunately,
> > 8165231 is one of the ones that has been approved and so will be in
> > 8u141, which is released in July.
> 
> We should discuss the rejected ones here.  We can decide to include
> them if they're very important.  Can you post them, please?
> 
> Andrew.
> 
> 

Sure. This is the full list:

Approved for 8u141 in July:

8144566: Custom HostnameVerifier disables SNI extension
8155049: New tests from 8144566 fail with "No expected Server Name Indication"
8165231: java.nio.Bits.unaligned() doesn't return true on ppc
8174164: SafePointNode::_replaced_nodes breaks with irreducible loops
8174729: Race Condition in java.lang.reflect.WeakCache
8175097: [TESTBUG] 8174164 fix missed the test

Rejected:

8173941: SA does not work if executable is DSO
8162384: Performance regression: bimorphic inlining may be bypassed by type speculation
8153711: [REDO] JDWP: Memory Leak: GlobalRefs never deleted when processing invokeMethod command

All three rejected ones are included in our RPMs. The last two arose
from reported customer issues. The DSO one is related to issues building
on the latest versions of Fedora.
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222




More information about the aarch64-port-dev mailing list