[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: 8189596: AArch64: implementation for Thread-local handshakes
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Fri Nov 24 15:30:58 UTC 2017
On 24/11/17 12:07, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> I can see why an ldar (actually ldarw) is needed when safepoint_poll is
> called from the nativewrapper. Can you explain why ldar is not needed
> for *all* calls to safepoint_poll?
Because there's no ordering to worry about: the worst that will happen
is that a safepoint will be acted on after, say, a memory location is
updated. But because in general we don't care about that ordering, it
doesn't matter.
--
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list