[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: 8215202: AArch64: jtreg test test/jdk/sun/nio/cs/FindEncoderBugs.java fails
Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China)
Nick.Gasson at arm.com
Fri Dec 28 03:35:27 UTC 2018
Hi Andrew / Dmitrij,
Is there anything else you want me to do with this one before it can be
committed?
Thanks,
Nick
On 12/12/2018 09:13, Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>> One thing: is randomChar() fully reproducible? That is to say, are
>> we sure that we always run the same tests?
>
> It uses jdk.test.lib.RandomFactory which seeds the RNG from the "seed"
> system property. So if this is set when running jtreg the results are
> fully reproducible.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
>> Sent: 12 December 2018 00:23
>> To: Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China) <Nick.Gasson at arm.com>; hotspot-
>> compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Cc: nio-dev at openjdk.java.net; nd <nd at arm.com>; aarch64-port-
>> dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: 8215202: AArch64: jtreg test
>> test/jdk/sun/nio/cs/FindEncoderBugs.java fails
>>
>> Good catch, again.
>>
>> On 12/11/18 8:05 AM, Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China) wrote:
>>> Also Extended the FindEncoderBugs test so that it hits all cases in
>>> the intrinsic assembly. Currently only the final NEXT_1 section is
>>> covered by this test.
>>
>> One thing: is randomChar() fully reproducible? That is to say, are
>> we sure that we always run the same tests?
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Haley
>> Java Platform Lead Engineer
>> Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
>> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list