[aarch64-port-dev ] [RFR] 8u152 Upstream Sync

[Aleksey Shipilev]

On 01/22/2018 05:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> At the time of the 8u151 security update, OpenJDK 8 was also updated
> with a general bug-fix release, 8u152, on which 8u161 is then based
> (webrevs for that to follow this).
> 
> This webrev brings jdk8u152-b16 into the aarch64/jdk8u repositories,
> tagging the result as aarch64-jdk8u152-b16
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/aarch64-8/u152/

I wonder if it would much be easier to review if we had the new diff against upstream jdk8u?
 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/

Because it looks from afar that the important bit is the before/after difference between
aarch64-port/jdk8u and jdk8u/jdk8u, not what upstream piles on with the sync.

== corba

Looks good and similar to jdk8u/jdk8u changes

== jaxp

Looks good. I have spot-checked suspicious places against jdk8u/jdk8u and it fits.

== jaxws

Looks good. I have spot-checked suspicious places against jdk8u/jdk8u and it fits.

== jdk

webrev says:
  96157 lines changed: 60958 ins; 27718 del; 7481 mod; 1979242 unchg

merge is only:
  290 files changed, 20272 insertions(+), 2901 deletions(-)

Seems like at least 10K lines are tests and test data.

Eyeballed the rest, seems ok.

== hotspot

webrev says:
  74646 lines changed: 72528 ins; 1126 del; 992 mod; 603645 unchg

merge is only:
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

But, I think Hotspot changesets is actually empty, apart from the tags?

 == langtools

Looks good. I have spot-checked suspicious places against jdk8u/jdk8u and it fits.

== nashorn

Looks good. I have spot-checked suspicious places against jdk8u/jdk8u and it fits.

Thanks,
-Aleksey